fix(trie): sparse trie tree masks

[shekhirin]

Two bugs:

1. store_in_db_trie for branch nodes wasn't set when revealing a node

   reth/crates/trie/sparse/src/trie.rs

   Lines 346 to 349 in 52f1291

   	store_in_db_trie: Some(
   	hash_mask.is_some_and(|mask| !mask.is_empty()) ||
   	tree_mask.is_some_and(|mask| !mask.is_empty()),
   	),

2. Blinded children of a branch node should inherit the tree mask bit as-is

   reth/crates/trie/sparse/src/trie.rs

   Lines 740 to 751 in 52f1291

   	// Determine whether we need to set trie mask bit.
   	let should_set_tree_mask_bit =
   	// A blinded node has the tree mask bit set
   	(
   	child_node_type.is_hash() &&
   	self.branch_node_tree_masks
   	.get(&path)
   	.is_some_and(|mask| mask.is_bit_set(last_child_nibble))
   	) ||
   	// A branch or an extension node explicitly set the
   	// `store_in_db_trie` flag
   	child_node_type.store_in_db_trie();

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #13760 will not alter performance

_{Comparing alexey/sparse-trie-tree-masks (f698d2c) with main (986c754)}

Summary

✅ 77 untouched benchmarks

[shekhirin]

@codspeed-hq thanks bro but I don't think it affects the perf

[shekhirin]

need to rename the field so it means collecting both masks