-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support jiff 0.2 #549
Support jiff 0.2 #549
Conversation
I pushed a fix, since as you point out it might be a bit unclear if 0.2.5 is included in <=0.2 |
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ actix-session = { version = "0", optional = true } | |||
actix-identity = { version = "0", optional = true } | |||
actix-files = { version = "0", optional = true } | |||
chrono = { version = "0.4", optional = true } | |||
jiff = { version = "0.1.5", optional = true } | |||
jiff = { version = "<0.3", optional = true } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, should it be >=0.1 && <0.3
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@snaggen here, what do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since the first version of jiff was 0.1, it doesn't matter either way. So I think <0.3 is better for simpicity
Let me fix the clippy first, then we can merge it |
Clippy issues resolved, could you please rebase? |
Done |
We can support jiff 02 with no code changes, so this patch only loosen up the version requirements