Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support jiff 0.2 #549

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2025
Merged

Support jiff 0.2 #549

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2025

Conversation

snaggen
Copy link
Contributor

@snaggen snaggen commented Feb 18, 2025

We can support jiff 02 with no code changes, so this patch only loosen up the version requirements

@snaggen
Copy link
Contributor Author

snaggen commented Feb 19, 2025

I pushed a fix, since as you point out it might be a bit unclear if 0.2.5 is included in <=0.2

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ actix-session = { version = "0", optional = true }
actix-identity = { version = "0", optional = true }
actix-files = { version = "0", optional = true }
chrono = { version = "0.4", optional = true }
jiff = { version = "0.1.5", optional = true }
jiff = { version = "<0.3", optional = true }
Copy link
Collaborator

@tiagolobocastro tiagolobocastro Feb 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, should it be >=0.1 && <0.3 ?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@snaggen here, what do you think?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since the first version of jiff was 0.1, it doesn't matter either way. So I think <0.3 is better for simpicity

@tiagolobocastro
Copy link
Collaborator

Let me fix the clippy first, then we can merge it

@tiagolobocastro
Copy link
Collaborator

Clippy issues resolved, could you please rebase?

@snaggen
Copy link
Contributor Author

snaggen commented Feb 19, 2025

Clippy issues resolved, could you please rebase?

Done

@tiagolobocastro tiagolobocastro merged commit 7807311 into paperclip-rs:master Feb 20, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants