Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add rerun failed workflows script #1784

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2023

Conversation

rambohe-ch
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment only one /kind <> line, hit enter to put that in a new line, and remove leading whitespace from that line:
/kind bug
/kind documentation
/kind enhancement
/kind good-first-issue
/kind feature
/kind question
/kind design
/sig ai
/sig iot
/sig network
/sig storage

/kind enhancement

What this PR does / why we need it:

reviewers or higher member can comment /rerun to trigger github actions that will rerun all failed workflows of the pull request.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


other Note

@openyurt-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@rambohe-ch: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: your_reviewer.

Note that only openyurtio members, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time.
For more information please see the contributor guide

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment only one /kind <> line, hit enter to put that in a new line, and remove leading whitespace from that line:
/kind bug
/kind documentation
/kind enhancement
/kind good-first-issue
/kind feature
/kind question
/kind design
/sig ai
/sig iot
/sig network
/sig storage

/kind enhancement

What this PR does / why we need it:

reviewers or higher member can comment /rerun to trigger github actions that will rerun all failed workflows of the pull request.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


other Note

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openyurt-bot openyurt-bot added the kind/enhancement kind/enhancement label Nov 9, 2023
@openyurt-bot openyurt-bot added approved approved size/M size/M: 30-99 labels Nov 9, 2023
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 9, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
1.1% 1.1% Duplication

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 9, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1784 (d3d751a) into master (c1a4760) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1784   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   52.19%   52.19%           
=======================================
  Files         172      172           
  Lines       20884    20884           
=======================================
  Hits        10901    10901           
  Misses       9021     9021           
  Partials      962      962           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 52.19% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@rambohe-ch
Copy link
Member Author

Fixes #1785

@rambohe-ch
Copy link
Member Author

/rerun

1 similar comment
@JameKeal
Copy link
Member

JameKeal commented Nov 9, 2023

/rerun

@JameKeal
Copy link
Member

JameKeal commented Nov 9, 2023

/rerun

rerun seems not to run again? The e2e-tests is not working.

Or that it can work after merge it.

@YTGhost
Copy link
Member

YTGhost commented Nov 9, 2023

/rerun

@rambohe-ch
Copy link
Member Author

/rerun

rerun seems not to run again? The e2e-tests is not working.

Or that it can work after merge it.

@JameKeal @YTGhost Yes, it seems this script can work after merged.

Copy link
Member

@YTGhost YTGhost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openyurt-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rambohe-ch, YTGhost

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved approved kind/enhancement kind/enhancement lgtm lgtm size/M size/M: 30-99
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants