Fix spatial resolution for saliency_maps in torchvision_models #3336
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
get_feature_vector
->feature_vector_fn
renaming for consistency. ReguestCurrently, in torchvision models the features are passed to the
explainer
after passingAvgPool2D
layer, that causes the final saliency map to lose spatial resolution (e.g.(2, 3, 1, 1)
instead of(2, 3, 7, 7)
).This PR breaks
backbone
intofeature_extractor
andavgpool
and passes features afterfeature_extractor
to explainer.Also I added tests to check spatial resolution of the resulting saliency maps.
Issue: CVS-137552
How to test
Checklist
License
Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.