Lucene 10 upgrade test fixes

[rithin-pullela-aws]

Description

Related Issues

Resolves #[Issue number to be closed when this PR is merged]

Check List

• New functionality includes testing.
• New functionality has been documented.
• API changes companion pull request created.
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff.
• Public documentation issue/PR created.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[mingshl]

@peterzhuamazon can you please help review this PR? This should help with the lucene 10 upgrade and also update the alpha artifacts, thanks!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 38.46154% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 80.27%. Comparing base (d7dec0f) to head (2c07f31).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...pensearch/ml/common/model/LocalRegexGuardrail.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...nsearch/ml/autoredeploy/MLModelAutoReDeployer.java	0.00%	0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...earch/ml/engine/indices/MLInputDatasetHandler.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...action/undeploy/TransportUndeployModelsAction.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...a/org/opensearch/ml/model/MLModelGroupManager.java	0.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
.../main/java/org/opensearch/ml/utils/IndexUtils.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #3530      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     80.25%   80.27%   +0.02%     
- Complexity     6906     6908       +2     
============================================
  Files           610      610              
  Lines         30077    30081       +4     
  Branches       3368     3368              
============================================
+ Hits          24137    24148      +11     
+ Misses         4487     4482       -5     
+ Partials       1453     1451       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
ml-commons	80.27% <38.46%> (+0.02%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Zhangxunmt]

LGTM, seems all required class path updates are included for Lucene 10.

From the codecov failure:
"plugin/src/main/java/org/opensearch/ml/utils/IndexUtils.java#L130
Added line #L130 was not covered by tests"

Can you add a test to cover this updated function call r.getHits().getTotalHits().value();?

[peterzhuamazon]

This is hardcoding, you should use ${opensearch_version}.

[peterzhuamazon]

Jacoco also needs to be 0.8.12 to support jdk23, which was initially added in this PR:

• Fix test failure after lucene upgrade to 10 #3426

seems some comments needed to address and those are addressed in #3426

[dhrubo-os]

Why are we duplicating the effort? When a PR is already raised from @zane-neo

[rithin-pullela-aws]

Why are we duplicating the effort? When a PR is already raised from @zane-neo

We wanted to test the proposed changes and potentially have them merged. Unfortunately, we could not do that.

[dhrubo-os]

@rithin-pullela-aws do we need this PR anymore?

[rithin-pullela-aws]

@rithin-pullela-aws do we need this PR anymore?

Closing this since #3426 is successfully merged