Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated the validation for search only replica settings #17093

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Updated the validation for search only replica settings #17093

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
bc88825
Updated the validation for search only replica settings
vinaykpud Jan 22, 2025
f91ad85
Added Changelog and fixed style issues
vinaykpud Jan 22, 2025
5ffbe1e
Removed the tests as its already covered in SearchOnlyReplicaTests
vinaykpud Jan 28, 2025
120731b
Merge branch 'main' into search-replica-index-template
vinaykpud Feb 3, 2025
cd9c6bc
Removed the changelog entry as there is not userfacing changes
vinaykpud Feb 4, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
15 changes: 7 additions & 8 deletions server/src/main/java/org/opensearch/cluster/metadata/MetadataCreateIndexService.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1055,9 +1055,6 @@ static Settings aggregateIndexSettings(

updateReplicationStrategy(indexSettingsBuilder, request.settings(), settings, combinedTemplateSettings, clusterSettings);
updateRemoteStoreSettings(indexSettingsBuilder, currentState, clusterSettings, settings, request.index());
if (FeatureFlags.isEnabled(FeatureFlags.READER_WRITER_SPLIT_EXPERIMENTAL_SETTING)) {
updateSearchOnlyReplicas(request.settings(), indexSettingsBuilder);
}

if (sourceMetadata != null) {
assert request.resizeType() != null;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1094,18 +1091,20 @@ static Settings aggregateIndexSettings(
validateRefreshIntervalSettings(request.settings(), clusterSettings);
validateTranslogFlushIntervalSettingsForCompositeIndex(request.settings(), clusterSettings);
validateTranslogDurabilitySettings(request.settings(), clusterSettings, settings);
if (FeatureFlags.isEnabled(FeatureFlags.READER_WRITER_SPLIT_EXPERIMENTAL_SETTING)) {
validateSearchOnlyReplicasSettings(indexSettings);
}
return indexSettings;
}

private static void updateSearchOnlyReplicas(Settings requestSettings, Settings.Builder builder) {
if (INDEX_NUMBER_OF_SEARCH_REPLICAS_SETTING.exists(builder) && builder.get(SETTING_NUMBER_OF_SEARCH_REPLICAS) != null) {
if (INDEX_NUMBER_OF_SEARCH_REPLICAS_SETTING.get(requestSettings) > 0
&& Boolean.parseBoolean(builder.get(SETTING_REMOTE_STORE_ENABLED)) == false) {
private static void validateSearchOnlyReplicasSettings(Settings indexSettings) {
if (INDEX_NUMBER_OF_SEARCH_REPLICAS_SETTING.exists(indexSettings) && indexSettings.get(SETTING_NUMBER_OF_SEARCH_REPLICAS) != null) {
if (INDEX_NUMBER_OF_SEARCH_REPLICAS_SETTING.get(indexSettings) > 0
&& Boolean.parseBoolean(indexSettings.get(SETTING_REMOTE_STORE_ENABLED)) == false) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"To set " + SETTING_NUMBER_OF_SEARCH_REPLICAS + ", " + SETTING_REMOTE_STORE_ENABLED + " must be set to true"
);
}
builder.put(SETTING_NUMBER_OF_SEARCH_REPLICAS, INDEX_NUMBER_OF_SEARCH_REPLICAS_SETTING.get(requestSettings));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

naive question as I'm not familiar with this code. This looks like a functional change to not set this on the builder anymore. Why is this not needed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Even though it looks like we removed something, keeping this statement actually sets SETTING_NUMBER_OF_SEARCH_REPLICAS to 0.
I'll check the tests and failures to confirm.

}
}

Expand Down
Loading