Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #6340 from openjournals/joss.06190
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history 
Merging automatically
  • Loading branch information
@editorialbot
editorialbot authored Jan 16, 2025
2 parents 77538fb + 014c9dc commit 7db5bb9
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 6 changed files with 927 additions and 0 deletions.
264 changes: 264 additions & 0 deletions joss.06190/10.21105.joss.06190.crossref.xml
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doi_batch xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1"
xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd"
xmlns:rel="http://www.crossref.org/relations.xsd"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
version="5.3.1"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1 http://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref5.3.1.xsd">
<head>
<doi_batch_id>20250116134541-1b97a4bc2dba2c4e482ba37ae3d5e8e82bcaa71e</doi_batch_id>
<timestamp>20250116134541</timestamp>
<depositor>
<depositor_name>JOSS Admin</depositor_name>
<email_address>[email protected]</email_address>
</depositor>
<registrant>The Open Journal</registrant>
</head>
<body>
<journal>
<journal_metadata>
<full_title>Journal of Open Source Software</full_title>
<abbrev_title>JOSS</abbrev_title>
<issn media_type="electronic">2475-9066</issn>
<doi_data>
<doi>10.21105/joss</doi>
<resource>https://joss.theoj.org</resource>
</doi_data>
</journal_metadata>
<journal_issue>
<publication_date media_type="online">
<month>01</month>
<year>2025</year>
</publication_date>
<journal_volume>
<volume>10</volume>
</journal_volume>
<issue>105</issue>
</journal_issue>
<journal_article publication_type="full_text">
<titles>
<title>ProMCDA: A Python package for Probabilistic Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis</title>
</titles>
<contributors>
<person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">
<given_name>Flaminia</given_name>
<surname>Catalli</surname>
<affiliations>
<institution><institution_name>wetransform GmbH, Germany</institution_name></institution>
</affiliations>
<ORCID>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0515-5282</ORCID>
</person_name>
<person_name sequence="additional"
contributor_role="author">
<given_name>Matteo</given_name>
<surname>Spada</surname>
<affiliations>
<institution><institution_name>Zurich University of Applied Sciences, School of Engineering, INE Institute of Sustainable Development, Switzerland</institution_name></institution>
</affiliations>
<ORCID>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9265-9491</ORCID>
</person_name>
</contributors>
<publication_date>
<month>01</month>
<day>16</day>
<year>2025</year>
</publication_date>
<pages>
<first_page>6190</first_page>
</pages>
<publisher_item>
<identifier id_type="doi">10.21105/joss.06190</identifier>
</publisher_item>
<ai:program name="AccessIndicators">
<ai:license_ref applies_to="vor">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ai:license_ref>
<ai:license_ref applies_to="am">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ai:license_ref>
<ai:license_ref applies_to="tdm">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ai:license_ref>
</ai:program>
<rel:program>
<rel:related_item>
<rel:description>Software archive</rel:description>
<rel:inter_work_relation relationship-type="references" identifier-type="doi">10.5281/zenodo.13694286</rel:inter_work_relation>
</rel:related_item>
<rel:related_item>
<rel:description>GitHub review issue</rel:description>
<rel:inter_work_relation relationship-type="hasReview" identifier-type="uri">https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6190</rel:inter_work_relation>
</rel:related_item>
</rel:program>
<doi_data>
<doi>10.21105/joss.06190</doi>
<resource>https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06190</resource>
<collection property="text-mining">
<item>
<resource mime_type="application/pdf">https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06190.pdf</resource>
</item>
</collection>
</doi_data>
<citation_list>
<citation key="cinelli_mcda_2020">
<article_title>MCDA Index Tool: An interactive software to develop indices and rankings</article_title>
<author>Cinelli</author>
<journal_title>Environment Systems and Decisions</journal_title>
<doi>10.1007/s10669-020-09784-x</doi>
<issn>2194-5403</issn>
<cYear>2020</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Cinelli, M., Spada, M., Kim, W., Zhang, Y., &amp; Burgherr, P. (2020). MCDA Index Tool: An interactive software to develop indices and rankings. Environment Systems and Decisions. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-020-09784-x</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="pereira_enhancing_2024">
<article_title>Enhancing decision analysis with a large language model: pyDecision a comprehensive library of MCDA methods in python</article_title>
<author>Pereira</author>
<journal_title>ArXiv</journal_title>
<doi>10.48550/arXiv.2404.06370</doi>
<cYear>2024</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Pereira, V., Basilio, M. P., &amp; Santos, C. H. T. (2024). Enhancing decision analysis with a large language model: pyDecision a comprehensive library of MCDA methods in python. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.06370</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="linden_framework_2021">
<article_title>A framework based on statistical analysis and stakeholders’ preferences to inform weighting in composite indicators</article_title>
<author>Lindén</author>
<journal_title>Environmental Modelling &amp; Software</journal_title>
<doi>10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105208</doi>
<cYear>2021</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Lindén, D., Cinelli, M., Spada, M., Becker, W., Gasser, P., &amp; Burgherr, P. (2021). A framework based on statistical analysis and stakeholders’ preferences to inform weighting in composite indicators. Environmental Modelling &amp; Software. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105208</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="lahdelma_smaa_1998">
<article_title>SMAA - Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis</article_title>
<author>Lahdelma</author>
<journal_title>European Journal of Operational Research</journal_title>
<issue>1</issue>
<volume>106</volume>
<doi>10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00163-X</doi>
<cYear>1998</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Lahdelma, R., Hokkanen, J., &amp; Salminen, P. (1998). SMAA - Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 106(1), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00163-X</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="cinelli_proper_2022">
<article_title>Proper and improper uses of MCDA methods in energy systems analysis</article_title>
<author>Cinelli</author>
<journal_title>Decision Support Systems</journal_title>
<volume>163</volume>
<doi>10.1016/j.dss.2022.113848</doi>
<cYear>2022</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Cinelli, M., Burgherr, P., Kadziński, M., &amp; Słowiński, R. (2022). Proper and improper uses of MCDA methods in energy systems analysis. Decision Support Systems, 163, 113848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2022.113848</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="kizielewicz2023pymcdm">
<article_title>Pymcdm—the universal library for solving multi-criteria decision-making problems</article_title>
<author>Kizielewicz</author>
<journal_title>SoftwareX</journal_title>
<volume>22</volume>
<doi>10.1016/j.softx.2023.101368</doi>
<cYear>2023</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Kizielewicz, B., Shekhovtsov, A., &amp; Sałabun, W. (2023). Pymcdm—the universal library for solving multi-criteria decision-making problems. SoftwareX, 22, 101368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2023.101368</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="becker_coinr_2022">
<article_title>COINr: An R package for developing composite indicators</article_title>
<author>Becker</author>
<journal_title>Journal of Open Source Software</journal_title>
<issue>78</issue>
<volume>7</volume>
<doi>10.21105/joss.04567</doi>
<issn>2475-9066</issn>
<cYear>2022</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Becker, W., Caperna, G., Sorbo, M. D., Norlén, H., Papadimitriou, E., &amp; Saisana, M. (2022). COINr: An R package for developing composite indicators. Journal of Open Source Software, 7(78), 4567. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04567</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="chacon-hurtado_decisi-o-rama_2021">
<article_title>Decisi-o-rama: An open-source Python library for multi-attribute value/utility decision analysis</article_title>
<author>Chacon-Hurtado</author>
<journal_title>Environmental Modelling &amp; Software</journal_title>
<volume>135</volume>
<doi>10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104890</doi>
<cYear>2021</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Chacon-Hurtado, J. C., &amp; Scholten, L. (2021). Decisi-o-rama: An open-source Python library for multi-attribute value/utility decision analysis. Environmental Modelling &amp; Software, 135, 104890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104890</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="fusco_spatial_2018">
<article_title>Spatial heterogeneity in composite indicator: A methodological proposal</article_title>
<author>Fusco</author>
<journal_title>Omega</journal_title>
<volume>77</volume>
<doi>10.1016/j.omega.2017.04.007</doi>
<cYear>2018</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Fusco, E., Vidoli, F., &amp; Sahoo, B. K. (2018). Spatial heterogeneity in composite indicator: A methodological proposal. Omega, 77, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.04.007</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="roy_decision_1996">
<article_title>Decision aiding: Major actors and the role of models</article_title>
<author>Roy</author>
<journal_title>Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding</journal_title>
<doi>10.1007/978-1-4757-2500-1_2</doi>
<isbn>978-1-4757-2500-1</isbn>
<cYear>1996</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Roy, B. (1996). Decision aiding: Major actors and the role of models. In B. Roy (Ed.), Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding (pp. 7–17). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2500-1_2</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="bouyssou_problem_2006">
<article_title>Problem formulation and structuring: The decision aiding process</article_title>
<journal_title>Evaluation and Decision Models with Multiple Criteria: Stepping Stones for the Analyst</journal_title>
<doi>10.1007/0-387-31099-1_2</doi>
<isbn>978-0-387-31099-2</isbn>
<cYear>2006</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T., Pirlot, M., Tsoukiàs, A., &amp; Vincke, P. (Eds.). (2006). Problem formulation and structuring: The decision aiding process. In Evaluation and Decision Models with Multiple Criteria: Stepping Stones for the Analyst (pp. 19–65). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-31099-1_2</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="greco_methodological_2019">
<article_title>On the methodological framework of composite indices: A review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness</article_title>
<author>Greco</author>
<journal_title>Social Indicators Research</journal_title>
<issue>1</issue>
<volume>141</volume>
<doi>10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9</doi>
<issn>0303-8300</issn>
<cYear>2019</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., &amp; Torrisi, G. (2019). On the methodological framework of composite indices: A review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness. Social Indicators Research, 141(1), 61–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="klaus_schwab_global_2018">
<article_title>The global competitiveness report 2018</article_title>
<author>Klaus Schwab</author>
<isbn>978-92-95044-76-0</isbn>
<cYear>2018</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Klaus Schwab. (2018). The global competitiveness report 2018. ISBN: 978-92-95044-76-0</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="otoiu_proposing_2018">
<article_title>Proposing a composite environmental index to account for the actual state and changes in environmental dimensions, as a critique to EPI</article_title>
<author>Oţoiu</author>
<journal_title>Ecological Indicators</journal_title>
<volume>93</volume>
<doi>10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.009</doi>
<cYear>2018</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Oţoiu, A., &amp; Grădinaru, G. (2018). Proposing a composite environmental index to account for the actual state and changes in environmental dimensions, as a critique to EPI. Ecological Indicators, 93, 1209–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.009</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="gasser_comprehensive_2020">
<article_title>Comprehensive resilience assessment of electricity supply security for 140 countries</article_title>
<author>Gasser</author>
<journal_title>Ecological Indicators</journal_title>
<volume>110</volume>
<doi>10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105731</doi>
<cYear>2020</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Gasser, P., Suter, J., Cinelli, M., Spada, M., Burgherr, P., Hirschberg, S., Kadziński, M., &amp; Stojadinovic, B. (2020). Comprehensive resilience assessment of electricity supply security for 140 countries. Ecological Indicators, 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105731</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="volkart_interdisciplinary_2016">
<article_title>Interdisciplinary assessment of renewable, nuclear and fossil power generation with and without carbon capture and storage in view of the new Swiss energy policy</article_title>
<author>Volkart</author>
<journal_title>International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control</journal_title>
<volume>54</volume>
<doi>10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.08.023</doi>
<cYear>2016</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Volkart, K., Bauer, C., Burgherr, P., Hirschberg, S., Schenler, W., &amp; Spada, M. (2016). Interdisciplinary assessment of renewable, nuclear and fossil power generation with and without carbon capture and storage in view of the new Swiss energy policy. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 54, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.08.023</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="stewart_dealing_2016">
<article_title>Dealing with uncertainties in MCDA</article_title>
<author>Stewart</author>
<journal_title>Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys</journal_title>
<doi>10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_12</doi>
<isbn>978-1-4939-3094-4</isbn>
<cYear>2016</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Stewart, T. J., &amp; Durbach, I. (2016). Dealing with uncertainties in MCDA. In S. Greco, M. Ehrgott, &amp; J. R. Figueira (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys (pp. 467–496). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_12</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="langhans_method_2014">
<article_title>The method matters: A guide for indicator aggregation in ecological assessments</article_title>
<author>Langhans</author>
<journal_title>Ecological Indicators</journal_title>
<volume>45</volume>
<doi>10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.014</doi>
<issn>1470-160X</issn>
<cYear>2014</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Langhans, S. D., Reichert, P., &amp; Schuwirth, N. (2014). The method matters: A guide for indicator aggregation in ecological assessments. Ecological Indicators, 45, 494–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.014</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
</citation_list>
</journal_article>
</journal>
</body>
</doi_batch>
Binary file added joss.06190/10.21105.joss.06190.pdf
View file
Binary file not shown.
Loading

0 comments on commit 7db5bb9

Please sign in to comment.