-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
The prebuilt APKs in the ARCH folder (e.g. arm64) should be preferred over the prebuilt APKs in the all folder.
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
18 additions
and
19 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
f8bd617
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey, can you please test this commit with x86 and x86_64 arches?
I'm pretty sure it breaks those.Maybe it's having trouble falling back to all? I'm not really sure. @stefanhh0
f8bd617
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @greyltc,
please open an issue with your findings and include as much information as you have available. I will then try to reproduce it on x86 and x86_64
Can you elaborate a little why it is breaking x86 and x86_64 i.e. adding some log output?
Thanks & best regards,
Stefan
f8bd617
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Stefan. Thanks for the thorough reply! I am getting build failures for my x86_64 builds (the error actually is that on version 28, ActionsServices is not available for x86_64). After looking into it more closely, that doesn't seem to be related to this commit as I had thought previously. I'm doing some debugging/trials now to try to better understand where the problem actually comes from. I'll follow up when I understand things more to be able to provide a bit more clarity and post an issue if it warrants one.
f8bd617
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could be caused by packages like
TrichromeLibrary
that are mandatory forChrome
/WebViewChrome
but currently only provided for arm64 (with noall
fallback) in gapps repos, similar to the issue forarm
reported last week.Indeed, providing the exact build failure will help us pin-point the issue and resolve it in an appropriate manner.
f8bd617
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@stefanhh0 as promised, here is a concise issue report on the problem #255 So not related to this commit!