fix: fixes wrong prescription provider being recorded #7917
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
stephenwaite
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2025
bradymiller
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2025
sjpadgett
approved these changes
Jan 19, 2025
|
we should merge this if @adunsulag doesn't have issue |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #7916
Short description of what this resolves:
Fixes a variable name typo which resulted in the current user rather than the selected provider being recorded as the provider on prescription
Changes proposed in this pull request:
Changing the variable name provider.id on line 160 to the correct one of providerId
Does your code include anything generated by an AI Engine? Yes / No
no
If you answered yes: Verify that each file that has AI generated code has a description that describes what AI engine was used and that the file includes AI generated code. Sections of code that are entirely or mostly generated by AI should be marked with a comment header and footer that includes the AI engine used and stating the code was AI.