Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[virtual-vlnv] Add CLI option to add virtual providers #727

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

a-will
Copy link
Contributor

@a-will a-will commented Jan 30, 2025

Add --add-vlnv to enable adding user-requested VLNVs that are not under the "system" or top core's explicit dependency tree. The intention of this argument is to allow users to specify cores that provide the implementations of virtual VLNVs in these "side" trees. The CLI option allows users to provide these without requiring someone to write a core file with the explicit deps, so targets may be reused across multiple different configurations, and users don't need to have duplicate core files that only differ by virtual providers.

@a-will a-will force-pushed the add-virt-providers branch from 6f75aed to f9182be Compare January 30, 2025 21:48
Add --add-vlnv to enable adding user-requested VLNVs that are not under
the "system" or top core's explicit dependency tree. The intention of
this argument is to allow users to specify cores that provide the
implementations of virtual VLNVs in these "side" trees. The CLI option
allows users to provide these without requiring someone to write a core
file with the explicit deps, so targets may be reused across multiple
different configurations, and users don't need to have duplicate core
files that only differ by virtual providers.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Williams <[email protected]>
@a-will a-will force-pushed the add-virt-providers branch from f9182be to 8003cbe Compare January 30, 2025 21:50
@a-will
Copy link
Contributor Author

a-will commented Jan 30, 2025

@olofk Here's a potential implementation of that command-line option I was talking about (for providing more dynamic insertion of deps to resolve virtual core references).

@HU90m
Copy link

HU90m commented Jan 31, 2025

@a-will a-will mentioned this pull request Jan 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants