Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add/streamline property chains over 'in taxon' (RO:0002162). #832

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gouttegd
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR adds several property chains of the form

X o 'in taxon' SubPropertyOf: 'in taxon'

where X represents the following properties:

  • 'mereotologically related to' (RO:0002323),
  • 'developmentally related to' (RO:0002324),
  • 'relation between physical entity and a process or stage' (RO:0002487),
  • 'innervated_by' (RO:0002005),
  • 'innvervates' (RO:0002134),
  • 'produced by' (RO:0003001),
  • 'produces' (RO:0003000).

Existing property chains over properties that are subproperties of those listed above (e.g. 'part of', BFO:0000050) are removed since they are no longer necessary.

closes #831

This commit adds several property chains of the form

  X o 'in taxon' SubPropertyOf: 'in taxon'

where X represents the following properties:

* 'mereotologically related to' (RO:0002323),
* 'developmentally related to' (RO:0002324),
* 'relation between physical entity and a process or stage' (RO:0002487),
* 'innervated_by' (RO:0002005),
* 'innvervates' (RO:0002134),
* 'produced by' (RO:0003001),
* 'produces' (RO:0003000).

Existing property chains over properties that are subproperties of those
listed above (e.g. 'part of', BFO:0000050) are removed since they are no
longer necessary.

closes #831
@gouttegd gouttegd requested a review from anitacaron as a code owner February 21, 2025 12:42
@gouttegd gouttegd self-assigned this Feb 21, 2025
@gouttegd gouttegd requested review from cmungall and balhoff February 21, 2025 17:40
Copy link
Member

@balhoff balhoff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

'relation between physical entity and a process or stage' seems a bit strong. I would like to have @cmungall's opinion on this one.

@gouttegd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yes, I’ve been wondering about this one as well. I would have no objection to setting the chain one level below, at the level of 'existence overlaps' instead.

@jamesaoverton
Copy link
Contributor

@gouttegd explain his reasoning on the RO call, and I agree with him. I don't use these relations in my work, so I can't test them myself.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add more property chains over in taxon
3 participants