Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Folding: make the variable name more explicits #2266

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 30, 2024

Conversation

dannywillems
Copy link
Member

ins_i and wit_i variable names are reused. However, their semantics changed when
called compute_extension on the environment. The values contain the
commitments/evaluations added by quadriticization.

In a future PR, the values will be returned as part of the folded output to pass
them to the IVC circuit.

ins_i and wit_i variable names are reused. However, their semantics changed when
called compute_extension on the environment. The values contain the
commitments/evaluations added by quadriticization.

In a future PR, the values will be returned as part of the folded output to pass
them to the IVC circuit.
It seems that `cargo +nightly fmt` is not always stable. It doesn't remove
duplicated import for instance.
@dannywillems dannywillems self-assigned this May 30, 2024
@dannywillems dannywillems merged commit 899567f into master May 30, 2024
6 checks passed
@dannywillems dannywillems deleted the dw/naming-var-folding branch May 30, 2024 17:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants