Set max network number to 8000 instead of 8192

[Andrew-Dickinson]

The docs and configen say the max number is 8000 and we should be consistent with that

Also enforces minimum and maximum NN at node creation time

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.88%. Comparing base (8feaa16) to head (f8fa204).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #803   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.88%   94.88%           
=======================================
  Files          89       89           
  Lines        3809     3812    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits         3614     3617    +3     
  Misses        195      195           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[WillNilges]

If MeshDB can support it, why not update docs/configgen/etc and take advantage of the extra NNs?

[WillNilges]

Why were all these higher than 8192 in the first place? Were we not enforcing them before?

[Andrew-Dickinson]

Good question. The PR is too old and I don't remember lol

[WillNilges]

Talked about this in slack. Things will get kind of messy, and it's not worth trying to get an extra 192 addresses in this PR.

Well for one thing there are devices using 8xxx IPs without central coordination

The trouble with changing the published convention to match the behavior rather than the other way around is it’s hard to anticipate the ways in which people rely on 8k being the limit

We will certainly in the future need to resolve this issue, but probably not for years

And hopefully we get far enough ahead of it that 192 IPs won’t make much of a difference