Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

W-17525042: RevAPI JPMS support. #173

Open
wants to merge 20 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

W-17525042: RevAPI JPMS support. #173

wants to merge 20 commits into from

Conversation

IvanAndresFritzler
Copy link

No description provided.

@IvanAndresFritzler
W-17421329: Test Coverage for the RevAPI JPMS support.
05ffc29
@IvanAndresFritzler
Self review
2ba18a4
@IvanAndresFritzler
Self review
0ea563a
@IvanAndresFritzler
W-17457827: JPMS support for the RevAPI plugin.
21219f3
@IvanAndresFritzler
Initial support for reading annotations (jpms modules are now fully l…
0d056e3 
…oaded).
@IvanAndresFritzler
Self review
0c8d789
@IvanAndresFritzler
Refactor in order to move JPMS logic to the JPMS filter.
e52d803
@IvanAndresFritzler
Removing module layer generation and adding module system modes.
e214afc
@IvanAndresFritzler
Adding gus ticket to promotedApi pom
afa7f9b
@IvanAndresFritzler
Reverting revapi plugin version setup
0e87ac5
@IvanAndresFritzler
Refactor that makes the JPMS validation use the RevApi APIs
64d5f38
@IvanAndresFritzler
Code review
8fee6e8
@IvanAndresFritzler
More coverage
529ee71
@IvanAndresFritzler
Looks like the cache is a problem after the refactor
b4859e5
@IvanAndresFritzler
Adding a feature to exclude export targets when the mode is jpms
42d8afd
@IvanAndresFritzler
Automatic module detection
4bac5a0
@IvanAndresFritzler
Self review
e20f9bc
@IvanAndresFritzler
Including open directives
9a939c7
@IvanAndresFritzler
Using MULE for tests until we have either an onboarded revapi fork or…
f5ec9f4 
… a new revapi version with our changes merged.
@IvanAndresFritzler
Self review
39fcfdd
@sonarqube-as-a-service sonarqube-as-a-service
Copy link

SonarQube Quality Gate

Quality Gate failed

Failed condition 0.0% Line Coverage on New Code (is less than 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube

@IvanAndresFritzler IvanAndresFritzler marked this pull request as ready for review January 28, 2025 20:30
@IvanAndresFritzler IvanAndresFritzler requested a review from a team as a code owner January 28, 2025 20:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@IvanAndresFritzler