Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

W-16863951 : Json vulnerability removed #457

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

asish-sf
Copy link

No description provided.

@asish-sf asish-sf requested review from a team as code owners November 12, 2024 14:01
pom.xml Outdated
<groupId>org.mule.runtime</groupId>
<artifactId>mule-metadata-model-json</artifactId>
<version>1.3.0</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this provided by the application developer?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes it is, below is the dependency tree :
+- org.mule.runtime:mule-metadata-model-json:jar:1.3.0:provided
[INFO] | +- com.google.code.gson:gson:jar:2.8.5:provided
[INFO] | +- org.everit.json:org.everit.json.schema:jar:1.5.1:provided
[INFO] | +- org.mule.runtime:mule-metadata-model-api:jar:1.3.0:provided
[INFO] | - org.mule.runtime:api-annotations:jar:1.2.0:provided

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still my question is unanswered. Can you please check how these dependency will come in an application. Provided scopes are need to be provided by the user. So in this case application developer. Can you check in anypoint studio. If you do not provide this in application pom what will happen.

Copy link
Contributor

@dipeshkumardutta-sfemu dipeshkumardutta-sfemu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants