Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make RegisterSerializer generic #4422

Closed

Conversation

SimonCropp
Copy link
Contributor

this is purely cosmetic. so feel free to burn it if u dont like it

Copy link
Member

@Evangelink Evangelink left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine by me. @MarcoRossignoli WDYT ?

@SimonCropp
Copy link
Contributor Author

yeah it just makes the usage a little more succinct

{
_typeSerializer.Add(type, namedPipeSerializer);
INamedPipeSerializer namedPipeSerializer = new TSerializer();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A minor difference here is that Activator.CreateInstance is now used to construct namedPipeSerializer.

Copy link
Member

@Evangelink Evangelink left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SimonCropp I have discussed it with the team and we will stick with current approach. Activator.CreateInstance should work with NAOT and trimming but we don't know if there are cases where it would be different. We don't yet have automatized enough tests around NAOT and trimming and we know current approach does work on all manual tests we did.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants