Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README.md #12

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 21, 2023
Merged

Update README.md #12

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
99e5553
Update README.md
LakshyAAAgrawal Nov 21, 2023
a0d56ed
Update README.md
LakshyAAAgrawal Nov 21, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ For example, consider the partial code to be completed in the figure below. To c

MGD uses static analysis to guide the decoding of LMs, to generate code following certain properties. In the example, MGD is used to monitor for generating code with type-correct dereferences, and the SantaCoder model with the same prompt is able to generate the correct code completion, which compiles and matches the ground truth as well.

As reported in the paper, we observe that **MGD can improve the compilation rate of code generated by LMs at all scales (350M-175B) by 19-25%**, without any training/fine-tuning required. Further, it boosts the ground-truth match at all granularities from token-level to method-level code completion.

![](figures/motivating_example.png)

## 1. Datasets
Expand Down