Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Protobuf / clang-format fixes #39

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024
Merged

Protobuf / clang-format fixes #39

merged 7 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

tilsche
Copy link
Contributor

@tilsche tilsche commented Dec 3, 2023

No description provided.

This uses the config version of FindPackage.
But we have to sue the module compatibiltiy, because the build commands of config version are totally different and undocumented.

see protocolbuffers/protobuf#12637 (comment)
see https://stackoverflow.com/a/56896032/620382
- remove duplicates
- remove unsupported options
- fix options that were previsouly bool and are now string
- manual BraceWrapping to avoid breaking lambdas (that would be really bad for our callback-hell)
@tilsche
Copy link
Contributor Author

tilsche commented Dec 3, 2023

Ugh, our ubuntu build doesn't like it, it doesn't seem to have a ProtobufConfig.cmake. But that is the cleanest solution for the abseil dependency. What do we do?

@bmario bmario merged commit 40018cb into master Feb 2, 2024
6 checks passed
@bmario bmario deleted the tilsche-proto22 branch February 2, 2024 13:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants