solution #2192
solution #2192
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job on implementing the formatDate function! 🎉 It meets the task requirements and constraints effectively. While there are some minor improvements suggested, such as making the century logic configurable and avoiding destructive array operations, these do not impact the core functionality. Keep up the good work and consider these suggestions for future enhancements! 😊
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
| // write code here | ||
| const dateParts = {}; | ||
| const newDateParts = []; | ||
| const split = fromFormat.pop(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using pop() on fromFormat modifies the array destructively, which may lead to unexpected behavior if fromFormat is reused elsewhere. Consider using slice(-1)[0] to get the last element without modifying the array.
| const dateParts = {}; | ||
| const newDateParts = []; | ||
| const split = fromFormat.pop(); | ||
| const newSplit = toFormat.pop(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using pop() on toFormat modifies the array destructively, which may lead to unexpected behavior if toFormat is reused elsewhere. Consider using slice(-1)[0] to get the last element without modifying the array.
| if (year < 30) { | ||
| newDateParts.push('20' + (year < 10 ? '0' + year : year)); | ||
| } else { | ||
| newDateParts.push('19' + year); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The logic for determining the century based on a two-digit year assumes that years less than 30 belong to the 2000s and others to the 1900s. This assumption may not be suitable for all use cases. Consider making this logic configurable or documenting this behavior clearly.
No description provided.