task solution #2173
task solution #2173
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job on implementing the formatDate function! 🎉 Your solution meets the task requirements and handles the conversion of date formats effectively. While there are some assumptions in the code regarding separators and format indices, these do not impact the core functionality. Keep up the good work, and consider refining these areas for even more robust code in the future! 😊
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
| const splitSeparator = fromFormat[fromFormat.length - 1]; | ||
| const splitDate = date.split(splitSeparator); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code assumes that the last element of fromFormat is the separator, which may not always be the case. Consider explicitly specifying the separator or handling cases where the separator is not the last element.
| const splitSeparator = fromFormat[fromFormat.length - 1]; | ||
| const splitDate = date.split(splitSeparator); | ||
|
|
||
| const joinSeparator = toFormat[toFormat.length - 1]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to the previous comment, the code assumes that the last element of toFormat is the separator. Ensure that this assumption holds true for all inputs or adjust the logic to handle different cases.
| const fromYYYY = fromFormat.includes('YY') | ||
| ? fromFormat.indexOf('YY') | ||
| : fromFormat.indexOf('YYYY'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The logic for determining the index of the year format (YY or YYYY) is correct, but ensure that fromFormat always contains one of these formats to avoid potential errors.
| const toYYYY = toFormat.includes('YY') | ||
| ? toFormat.indexOf('YY') | ||
| : toFormat.indexOf('YYYY'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The logic for determining the index of the year format in toFormat is correct, but similar to the previous comment, ensure that toFormat always contains one of these formats to avoid potential errors.
| if (fromFormat[fromYYYY].length > toFormat[toYYYY].length) { | ||
| splitDate[fromYYYY] = splitDate[fromYYYY].slice(2); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This block correctly handles the conversion from a four-digit year to a two-digit year. Ensure that the input year is always valid to prevent slicing errors.
| if (fromFormat[fromYYYY].length < toFormat[toYYYY].length) { | ||
| if (+splitDate[fromYYYY] < 30) { | ||
| splitDate[fromYYYY] = '20' + splitDate[fromYYYY]; | ||
| } else { | ||
| splitDate[fromYYYY] = '19' + splitDate[fromYYYY]; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This block handles the conversion from a two-digit year to a four-digit year based on a threshold. Ensure that the threshold logic (year < 30) is appropriate for all use cases.
No description provided.