solution

[mForkosh]

No description provided.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

---

Thank you for your hard work on this Pull Request! 😊 While your solution meets many of the task requirements, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed before we can approve it:

1. Index Validation: The use of indexOf can lead to an error if toFormat[i] is not found in fromFormat, resulting in a -1 index. Please add a check to ensure that the position is valid before accessing dateArray[position].

2. Century Logic: The current logic for determining the century based on the year being less than 30 is not flexible for all scenarios. It would be beneficial to make this logic configurable or to provide a more robust solution to handle different use cases.

3. Separator Assumption: The code assumes that the separator is always the fourth element in the format arrays, which might not hold true if the format arrays are not structured as expected. Please add validation to ensure the format arrays contain the expected elements.

Addressing these issues will enhance the robustness and flexibility of your code. Keep up the great work, and I look forward to your updated submission! 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

The code assumes that the separator is always the fourth element in the format arrays. This might not be the case if the format arrays are not structured as expected. Consider validating the format arrays to ensure they contain the expected elements.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

The logic for determining the century (19 or 20) based on the year being less than 30 is a common practice but might not be suitable for all use cases. Consider making this logic configurable or providing a more robust solution.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

The indexOf method will return -1 if the toFormat[i] is not found in fromFormat, which will cause an error when accessing dateArray[position]. Consider adding a check to ensure position is valid before using it.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

---

Review Summary

Great job on improving the code! 🎉 You've made significant progress by addressing some of the key issues:

1. Index Validation: You've added a check to ensure that the position is valid before accessing dateArray[position]. This prevents errors from invalid indices, which is a crucial improvement.

2. Century Logic: The logic for determining the century has been implemented correctly based on the task requirements. However, consider making this logic more flexible or configurable in the future to handle different scenarios.

3. Separator Assumption: The code correctly handles the separator dynamically by using pop(), ensuring it doesn't rely on a fixed position. This is a good approach, but make sure the format arrays are structured as expected or add validation to handle unexpected structures.

While there are still some critical issues that need attention, such as making the century logic more robust and ensuring the format arrays are validated, the decision to approve this Pull Request is made to help you move forward with your learning. Please review the comments and continue to improve your code. Keep up the great work and learn from these experiences! 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

The logic for determining the century is hardcoded to assume that years less than 30 belong to the 2000s and years 30 or greater belong to the 1900s. This logic might not be suitable for all scenarios. Consider making this logic configurable or more robust to handle different use cases.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

The code assumes that the separator is always the last element in the format arrays. Ensure that the format arrays are structured as expected, or add validation to handle unexpected structures.