Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(labels): add skip-changelog-orchestrator label to config #505

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jbcaron
Copy link
Member

@jbcaron jbcaron commented Feb 26, 2025

Pull Request type

Please add the labels corresponding to the type of changes your PR introduces:

  • Other (please describe): ci/label

What is the current behavior?

The Skip-Changelog label was created manually, but we have a dedicated CI process for managing labels. Since it was not initially defined in label.yml, it was not automatically synchronized with other labels.

Resolves: #NA

What is the new behavior?

This PR adds the skip-changelog label definition to label.yml, ensuring that label management is handled by the CI rather than manually.

This allows the CI to consistently manage labels instead of relying on manual additions.

Does this introduce a breaking change?

No

Other information

Once this PR is good to merge, the Sync labels workflow must be triggered to properly synchronize the labels across the repository, ensuring consistency between existing labels and those referenced in other workflows.

@jbcaron jbcaron self-assigned this Feb 26, 2025
@Trantorian1 Trantorian1 added the infrastructure CI/CD, deployment and infrastructure changes label Feb 27, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@Trantorian1 Trantorian1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
infrastructure CI/CD, deployment and infrastructure changes
Projects
Status: In progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants