Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-48582: factor out configs that are repeated for each kind of visit/source analysis #347

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

TallJimbo
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
# Configuration for standard instances of
# sst.analysis.tools.tasks.refCatSourceAnalysis.RefCatSourceAnalysisTask
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing l

config.atools.photoDiffPsfScatterVisitPlot = TargetRefCatDeltaPsfScatterVisitPlot
config.atools.photoDiffCModelScatterVisitPlot = TargetRefCatDeltaAp09ScatterVisitPlot

# TODO: should there be a VisitContext set here, too?
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The contexts are applied in each atool so probably not.

This aligns the default with what LSSTComCam and LSSTComCamSim had been
doing via overrides in drp_pipe, while adding some new analysis
instantiations to HSC, ImSim and other precursors.  That gives us more
test coverage of these configurations while letting us drop
duplicative configuration blocks from drp_pipe.
This lets us delete many duplicate configurations for this task in
drp_pipe.
This lets us delete duplicate configurations for this task in drp_pipe.
In AstrometricCatalogMatchVisitTask.
@TallJimbo TallJimbo merged commit f846648 into main Feb 7, 2025
13 checks passed
@TallJimbo TallJimbo deleted the tickets/DM-48582 branch February 7, 2025 22:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants