Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[topgen] Properly uniquify the incoming alert names #25960

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

Razer6
Copy link
Member

@Razer6 Razer6 commented Jan 21, 2025

Otherwise, we would end up in conflicts when adding incoming alerts from other domains, which have the same module and alert name.

@Razer6 Razer6 requested a review from msfschaffner as a code owner January 21, 2025 15:43
@Razer6 Razer6 requested review from rswarbrick and vogelpi and removed request for msfschaffner January 21, 2025 15:43
@Razer6 Razer6 force-pushed the incoming-alert-fixes branch from c146012 to bf8730d Compare January 21, 2025 16:10
@sameo
Copy link
Contributor

sameo commented Jan 21, 2025

Should you run topgen and include the new generated files as part of this PR?

@Razer6
Copy link
Member Author

Razer6 commented Jan 21, 2025

Should you run topgen and include the new generated files as part of this PR?

As discussed offline, this code path is only hit when defining external alerts. Thus in upstream, there is no diff in the generated code.

Copy link
Contributor

@vogelpi vogelpi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks @Razer6 !

@vogelpi vogelpi merged commit e40fe4e into lowRISC:master Jan 23, 2025
38 checks passed
@Razer6 Razer6 deleted the incoming-alert-fixes branch January 23, 2025 12:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants