Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More GRPC Docs #611

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Jan 22, 2024
Merged

More GRPC Docs #611

merged 14 commits into from
Jan 22, 2024

Conversation

coltmcnealy-lh
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Adds documentation for schemas/common_wfspec.proto
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ export type Exact<P, I extends P> = P extends Builtin ? P

function toTimestamp(dateStr: string): Timestamp {
const date = new globalThis.Date(dateStr);
const seconds = date.getTime() / 1_000;
const seconds = Math.trunc(date.getTime() / 1_000);
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this changed? Did someone change the protoc version?

@@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ export type Exact<P, I extends P> = P extends Builtin ? P

function toTimestamp(dateStr: string): Timestamp {
const date = new globalThis.Date(dateStr);
const seconds = date.getTime() / 1_000;
const seconds = Math.trunc(date.getTime() / 1_000);
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like a protoc version change. Weird. @sauljabin any ideas?

@coltmcnealy-lh
Copy link
Member Author

Team, this is ready to go. @eduwercamacaro remember when we were on zoom, we made a small change to LHServerConnectionManager when trying to fix the way the exception stacktrace was displayed? Well, that ended up breaking two end-to-end tests. One of them was because it was looking for the stacktrace in the wrong place (test issue), and the other because somehow the WfRun didn't fail (which is an actual bug).

I reverted that change, so this PR is strictly a docs PR. But we need to fix that.

@coltmcnealy-lh coltmcnealy-lh merged commit c8009d2 into master Jan 22, 2024
11 checks passed
@coltmcnealy-lh coltmcnealy-lh deleted the minor/more-proto-docs branch January 22, 2024 16:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants