Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes - warning, changed github token to GIT_ACTIONS_BOT_PAT_CLASSIC #1019

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2025

Conversation

mirooon
Copy link
Contributor

@mirooon mirooon commented Feb 20, 2025

Which Jira task belongs to this PR?

Why did I implement it this way?

Previously in the securityAlertsReview.yml there was a warning
image
so that was fixed.
securityAlertsReview.yml was using invalid github token leading to 403 error while posting a comment

Checklist before requesting a review

Checklist for reviewer (DO NOT DEPLOY and contracts BEFORE CHECKING THIS!!!)

  • I have checked that any arbitrary calls to external contracts are validated and or restricted
  • I have checked that any privileged calls (i.e. storage modifications) are validated and or restricted
  • I have ensured that any new contracts have had AT A MINIMUM 1 preliminary audit conducted on by <company/auditor>

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 20, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates two GitHub Actions workflow files. One change ensures that the static analysis workflow handles file path arguments correctly by quoting the variable, while the other updates the security alerts review workflow to use a different personal access token for multiple API calls. No modifications were made to exported or public entities.

Changes

File(s) Changes Summary
.github/workflows/olympixStaticAnalysis.yml Modified the command to echo the variable with quotes, ensuring the preservation of whitespace in file names.
.github/workflows/securityAlertsReview.yml Replaced ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} with ${{ secrets.GIT_ACTIONS_BOT_PAT_CLASSIC }} across several workflow steps.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • ezynda3
  • maxklenk

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Errors were encountered while retrieving linked issues.

Errors (1)
  • JIRA integration encountered authorization issues. Please disconnect and reconnect the integration in the CodeRabbit UI.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/securityAlertsReview.yml (1)

271-271: Log Message Addition & YAML Formatting

The newly added log message (echo "✅ No blocking security issues found. The workflow will pass successfully.") clearly indicates the successful state when no issues are detected. However, YAMLlint reports a missing newline at the end of the file. Please add a newline after the last line to comply with YAML formatting best practices.

Suggested diff:

-          echo "✅ No blocking security issues found. The workflow will pass successfully."
+          echo "✅ No blocking security issues found. The workflow will pass successfully."
+
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 271-271: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8dc38b3 and ac305e6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/olympixStaticAnalysis.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/securityAlertsReview.yml (7 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/olympixStaticAnalysis.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/securityAlertsReview.yml

[error] 271-271: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: run-unit-tests
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/securityAlertsReview.yml (6)

29-29: Update GitHub Token in Analysis Check Step

The GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable is now set to ${{ secrets.GIT_ACTIONS_BOT_PAT_CLASSIC }} for the Olympix Static Analysis check. This change aligns with the PR objective and ensures that a token with appropriate permissions is consistently used. Please verify that this token has scopes suitable for accessing workflow run details.


61-61: Token Update in PR Number Validation

In the "Validate and set PR Number" step, the GitHub token has been updated to ${{ secrets.GIT_ACTIONS_BOT_PAT_CLASSIC }}. This ensures secure authorization when fetching the PR details. Confirm that downstream steps expecting the previous token are not adversely affected.


74-74: Token Update for Fetching Security Alerts

The environment variable change to use ${{ secrets.GIT_ACTIONS_BOT_PAT_CLASSIC }} in the "Fetch Security Alerts for PR" step is consistent. Make sure that this token’s permissions and rate limits are sufficient for the API calls being performed (especially for fetching code-scanning alerts).


121-121: Token Update in Finding Existing PR Comment

The GITHUB_TOKEN is updated here as well to ${{ secrets.GIT_ACTIONS_BOT_PAT_CLASSIC }}. This ensures that the API call for retrieving PR comments is properly authenticated. Please double-check that the new token permissions allow reading issue comments.


137-137: Token Update in Posting/Updating PR Comment

In the "Post or Update PR Comment" step, the updated token ${{ secrets.GIT_ACTIONS_BOT_PAT_CLASSIC }} is used. Verify that the token has adequate privileges to post and modify comments, and that JSON escaping within the comment body remains correctly handled.


238-238: Token Update for Reverting PR to Draft

The token update in the "Check if Action Should Fail And Revert To Draft" step to ${{ secrets.GIT_ACTIONS_BOT_PAT_CLASSIC }} is consistent with the other steps. Ensure that this token provides the necessary permissions to perform mutations (e.g., converting a PR to draft) via the GraphQL endpoint.

@mirooon mirooon marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2025 08:50
@mirooon mirooon changed the title Removed warning, changed github token to GIT_ACTIONS_BOT_PAT_CLASSIC Fixes - warning, changed github token to GIT_ACTIONS_BOT_PAT_CLASSIC Feb 20, 2025
@mirooon mirooon merged commit 40e5cda into main Feb 20, 2025
38 of 39 checks passed
@mirooon mirooon deleted the fix-warning-and-secret-var-name branch February 20, 2025 10:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants