Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat #575 - Add fvm flavor command #736

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 9, 2024

Conversation

digoreis
Copy link
Contributor

@digoreis digoreis commented Jun 7, 2024

This pull request introduces a new command, fvm flavor, to the Flutter Version Management (FVM) tool. The flavor command allows developers to execute Flutter commands using a specific Flutter SDK version defined by a project flavor.

Motivation

Issue #575

Results

How commands how messages:

Screenshot 2024-06-07 at 14 29 10

Documentation update:

Screenshot 2024-06-07 at 14 49 07
Screenshot 2024-06-07 at 14 48 51

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 7, 2024

@digoreis is attempting to deploy a commit to the FlutterTools Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 9, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
fvm ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jun 9, 2024 4:20pm

@@ -38,4 +38,12 @@ Will get the version configured for the flavor and set as the project version.
fvm use {flavor_name}
```

## Spwan a command with a flavor version
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small typo "spawn"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry

@leoafarias leoafarias merged commit 2083419 into leoafarias:main Jun 9, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants