Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

e2e: add kops validate step to metal test #16943

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2025
Merged

e2e: add kops validate step to metal test #16943

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2025
+53 −5

Conversation

justinsb
Copy link
Member

The cluster should be considered healthy by kOps at this point.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 11, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hakman

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 11, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

7 similar comments
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@rifelpet
Copy link
Member

/hold for failling GHA job

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 12, 2024
@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Dec 5, 2024

/lgtm cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 5, 2024
@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the e2e_validate_cluster branch from 155c78a to 9147abd Compare January 19, 2025 14:49
@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Jan 19, 2025

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 19, 2025
@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Jan 19, 2025

/override pull-kops-e2e-k8s-aws-amazonvpc

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@hakman: Overrode contexts on behalf of hakman: pull-kops-e2e-k8s-aws-amazonvpc

In response to this:

/override pull-kops-e2e-k8s-aws-amazonvpc

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Jan 19, 2025

@justinsb tests-e2e-scenarios-bare-metal is still broken:

W0119 15:07:32.541625   34032 validate_cluster.go:190] (will retry):
  unexpected error during validation: method metal.Cloud::GetCloudGroups not implemented

/hold

@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the e2e_validate_cluster branch from 9147abd to 14b0095 Compare January 19, 2025 22:06
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 19, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 19, 2025
@justinsb
e2e: add kops validate step to metal test
8538891 
The cluster should be considered healthy by kOps at this point.
@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the e2e_validate_cluster branch from 14b0095 to 8538891 Compare January 19, 2025 22:17
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@justinsb: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kops-e2e-cni-flannel 155c78a link true /test pull-kops-e2e-cni-flannel
pull-kops-e2e-gce-cni-cilium 155c78a link true /test pull-kops-e2e-gce-cni-cilium
pull-kops-e2e-gce-cni-calico 155c78a link true /test pull-kops-e2e-gce-cni-calico
pull-kops-e2e-gce-cni-kindnet 155c78a link true /test pull-kops-e2e-gce-cni-kindnet
pull-kops-kubernetes-e2e-ubuntu-gce-build 8538891 link false /test pull-kops-kubernetes-e2e-ubuntu-gce-build

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Jan 20, 2025

/lgtm
/unhold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Jan 20, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 2cbe03b into kubernetes:master Jan 20, 2025
23 of 24 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.32 milestone Jan 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hakman hakman hakman approved these changes

@olemarkus olemarkus Awaiting requested review from olemarkus

Assignees

@hakman hakman

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.32
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@justinsb @k8s-ci-robot @k8s-triage-robot @rifelpet @hakman