Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix order-dependent flakiness in KubernetesReconcilerCreatorTest.java #2897

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2023

Conversation

yijut2
Copy link
Contributor

@yijut2 yijut2 commented Nov 16, 2023

Describe the bug
The order dependent flakiness was detected when KubernetesReconcilerCreatorTest.java was run before the KubernetesInformerCreatorTest.java. The error appeared at line 157 in KubernetesInformerCreatorTest.java. It was suppose to get 1 result the calling getRequestedFor()for specific urlPattern, however, the actual result was 2.

Fix log
The reason that the flakiness showed up was due to the object SharedInformerFactory. Since in the KubernetesReconcilerCreatorTest.java, we called startAllRegisteredInformers in the test and registered the V1Pod, but did not call stopAllRegisteredInformers to stop the registration, and then when next test class was run, there were already something in the database. Eventually, that lead to the unexpected output 2 when we called getRequestedFor()for specific urlPattern. To fix this order dependent flakiness, I added sharedInformerFactory.stopAllRegisteredInformers() at the end of the test testSimplePodController() in KubernetesReconcilerCreatorTest.java. This can make sure there won't be 2 instance with specific QueryParam came from different test class being stored in the database.

Java Version
Java 17

To Reproduce
mvn install -pl spring -am -DskipTests
(must setup iDFlakies on a Maven project - https://github.com/UT-SE-Research/iDFlakies)
mvn -pl spring idflakies:detect -Ddetector.detector_type=random-class-method -Ddt.randomize.rounds=10 -Ddt.detector.original_order.all_must_pass=false

Expected behavior
When calling the getRequestedFor() method in KubernetesInformerCreatorTest, we should get the return value as 1 since we only generated the object with specific QueryParam once in this test file.

Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Nov 16, 2023

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 16, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @yijut2!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-client/java 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-client/java has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 16, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Nov 16, 2023
@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for the PR!

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 16, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: brendandburns, yijut2

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 16, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 7a53684 into kubernetes-client:master Nov 16, 2023
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants