-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SortitionModule upgrade to add changeGovernor() #1862
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces version 0.9.0 upgrades to the Sortition Module contracts. The changes include updating version constants, adding a new Changes
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit 77054e3 and detected 2 issues on this pull request. Here's the issue category breakdown:
View more on Code Climate. |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
contracts/deploy/upgrade-sortition-module-v0.9.0.ts
(1 hunks)contracts/src/arbitration/SortitionModule.sol
(2 hunks)contracts/src/arbitration/SortitionModuleBase.sol
(1 hunks)contracts/src/arbitration/SortitionModuleNeo.sol
(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: SonarCloud
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: contracts-testing
🔇 Additional comments (5)
contracts/deploy/upgrade-sortition-module-v0.9.0.ts (1)
18-18
: LGTM! Upgrade script correctly uses initialize3.The upgrade script has been properly updated to use the new reinitializer. The warning comment about not reinitializing everything is a good practice for safe upgrades.
Let's verify the upgrade pattern is consistent across implementations:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: initialize3() implementation is consistent and correct
Both SortitionModule contracts implement initialize3() identically as empty reinitializer(3) functions, matching the upgrade script's usage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify initialize3 implementation across contracts # Test: Search for initialize3 function declarations # Expect: Consistent implementation as reinitializer(3) with NOP comment rg -U "function initialize3.*\{[\s\S]*?\}"Length of output: 481
contracts/src/arbitration/SortitionModule.sol (2)
18-18
: Version bump to 0.9.0 is appropriate.The version increment follows semantic versioning for adding new functionality (changeGovernor).
47-49
: LGTM! Reinitializer pattern is correctly implemented.The initialize3() function properly uses OpenZeppelin's reinitializer pattern and is correctly implemented as a NOP since no initialization is needed for this upgrade.
contracts/src/arbitration/SortitionModuleNeo.sol (2)
18-18
: Version bump to 0.9.0 matches SortitionModule.The version increment is consistent with SortitionModule, maintaining version parity between the modules.
61-63
: LGTM! Reinitializer matches SortitionModule implementation.The initialize3() function implementation is identical to SortitionModule, maintaining consistency across the upgrade.
/// @dev Changes the governor of the contract. | ||
/// @param _governor The new governor. | ||
function changeGovernor(address _governor) external onlyByGovernor { | ||
governor = _governor; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add event emission and input validation for governor change.
While the implementation is functionally correct, consider these security improvements:
- Emit an event when the governor changes for better transparency and off-chain tracking
- Validate that the new governor address is not zero to prevent accidental lockout
Apply this diff to improve the implementation:
function changeGovernor(address _governor) external onlyByGovernor {
+ require(_governor != address(0), "Governor address cannot be 0x0");
governor = _governor;
+ emit GovernorChanged(msg.sender, _governor);
}
+event GovernorChanged(address indexed previousGovernor, address indexed newGovernor);
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
PR-Codex overview
This PR focuses on updating the
SortitionModule
and its related contracts to version0.9.0
, adding a newchangeGovernor
function, and modifying the initializer function toinitialize3
.Detailed summary
changeGovernor(address _governor)
function toSortitionModuleBase
.initializer
frominitialize
toinitialize3
inupgrade-sortition-module.ts
.0.8.0
to0.9.0
in bothSortitionModuleNeo
andSortitionModule
.initialize3()
function in bothSortitionModuleNeo
andSortitionModule
.Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes v0.9.0
New Features
Improvements
Maintenance
These updates provide improved contract management and flexibility for the arbitration module.