-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added new option / preference #24
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Haven't checked the code but this would be an awesome little addition to the bookmarking extension. |
I'm not really sure if this is needed as users will always have the same order for their lists: they can be sorted manually and you have the same structure on the site and on the extension. I'm hesitant on adding this to distribution version as we're going to rebuild the extension from the ground up soon anyways. That will most likely feature a type to search style list filtering. |
I agree on the point that if lists have the same order on extension as on kippt.com - would help user experience, though I beg to differ with current ( default ) order of lists In my particular experience - After using kippt for almost everything ( bookmarks, Personal & Team research, read later, todo lists, etc ) I have 58 - There are 2 different user experiences I observed - On kippt.com ( Consumption )
On kippt-chrome extension ( Addition )
I have no clue if other people using kippt chrome extension actually have so many list or if the face they same problem while adding new clip from chrome extension. So, can't say if this feature woud do as much value addition to other as it has done to me. May be if we could this to distribution and add analytics :) @jorde - you would definitely have better idea - Adding this to distribution is your call. Also - I am sure new Chrome extension would cater to these problem. "type to search style list filtering" should solve it to some extent. Please let me know if I can help or contribute in anyways. PS - This is a Good Article by Nielsen Norman Group which goes beyond Alphabetical sort - Alphabetical Sorting Must (Mostly) Die - Ordinal sequences, logical structuring, time lines, or prioritization by importance or frequency are usually better than A-Z listings for presenting options to users. |
Search type filtering would be fine, but even there is need for some sort of "prioritization by frequency" –type of thing. |
I have faced this problem myself as I also have about 30-40 different lists. And when the number of items in your lists grow, its better to have them in alphabetical order (like apps in stock Android). However, some may beg to differ. Its a matter of opinion at the end of the day. Can't this feature be optional? Something like Order of lists with options like:
Not sure, just an idea. |
Added new option to show lists sorted in alphabetical order. Very useful when a user has a big number of lists - makes it easier to find a list when adding a new url.