Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add more e2e for WorkloadRebalancer #4961

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2024

Conversation

chaosi-zju
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind failing-test

What this PR does / why we need it:

add more e2e for WorkloadRebalancer

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes part of #4840

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:


@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the kind/failing-test Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test. label May 18, 2024
@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 18, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 53.32%. Comparing base (fcb46bb) to head (a850b14).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4961      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   53.31%   53.32%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         252      252              
  Lines       20485    20489       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        10921    10926       +5     
  Misses       8842     8842              
+ Partials      722      721       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 53.32% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@chaosi-zju chaosi-zju force-pushed the reschedule-e2e2 branch 3 times, most recently from 3a02179 to a850b14 Compare May 21, 2024 01:39
@chaosi-zju
Copy link
Member Author

CC @XiShanYongYe-Chang

@XiShanYongYe-Chang
Copy link
Member

/assign

Copy link
Member

@XiShanYongYe-Chang XiShanYongYe-Chang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's generally LGTM.

Copy link
Member

@XiShanYongYe-Chang XiShanYongYe-Chang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 22, 2024
@karmada-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: XiShanYongYe-Chang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 22, 2024
@karmada-bot karmada-bot merged commit a9f9020 into karmada-io:master May 22, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/failing-test Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants