Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

switch the BLAKE2b implementation to blake2b_simd #5

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2019
Merged

switch the BLAKE2b implementation to blake2b_simd #5

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2019

Conversation

oconnor663
Copy link
Contributor

@oconnor663 oconnor663 commented Nov 1, 2018 •
edited
Loading

This is about 17% faster on machines supporting AVX2, and the same speed
otherwise.

Full disclosure, blake2b_simd is my crate :)

@oconnor663
Copy link
Contributor Author

It does look like blake2b_simd is about 2% slower without AVX2, though this seems to be sensitive to compiler flags. oconnor663/blake2_simd#7

@oconnor663
switch the BLAKE2b implementation to blake2b_simd
6a8e290 
This is about 20% faster on machines supporting AVX2, and the same speed
otherwise.
@jtdowney jtdowney merged commit 6a8e290 into jtdowney:master Jun 18, 2019
jtdowney added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2019
@jtdowney
Merge pull request #5 from oconnor663/blake2b_simd
0c84b85 
switch the BLAKE2b implementation to blake2b_simd
@oconnor663 oconnor663 deleted the blake2b_simd branch June 19, 2019 02:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@oconnor663 @jtdowney