-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Project 3 #71
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Project 3 #71
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Excellent
(b) Transitive | ||
|
||
The object property, “existence ends with”, should have the transitive characteristic listed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very good. We should discuss these and consider having you post on the RO issue tracker: https://github.com/oborel/obo-relations
(b) Transitive | ||
|
||
The object property, “aligned with”, should not have the transitive property listed. Finn: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a very good find.
Tuesday instance_of one-dimensional temporal region | ||
Wednesday instance of one-dimensional temporal region | ||
Arm instance_of fiat object part | ||
“Sally participates in having at least one arm on Tuesday” instance of occurrent |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What exactly is an instance of occurrent here? A proposition?
Liver is a class in Uberon (UBERON_0002107), which is a subclass of material entity. | ||
https://ontobee.org/ontology/UBERON?iri=http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0002107 | ||
|
||
Argument ex auctoritate from BS for the object property has_part_at_all_times: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not good enough, try again.
Marriage instance_of occurent | ||
“Three years span 1” instance_of one-dimensional temporal region. | ||
Notice that the original phrase doesn’t say anything about Goofus and Gallant being | ||
married to each other, and we won’t represent such a fact. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes you will
C (x, t) = being a child at t | ||
A (x, t) = being an adult at t | ||
S (x, t) = being a senior at t | ||
∃t1∃t2∃t3 (C (j, t1) ∧ A (J, t2) ∧ S(J, t3) ∧ E (t1, t2) ∧ E (t1, t3)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your relation 'being earlier than' is underspecified. As it stands, the relation permits models in which E(t3, t1) holds as well.
(d) Goofus and Gallant have been married for three years; for each day of that span, | ||
it is true to assert they are married. | ||
|
||
Again, notice we are not modeling that Goofus and Gallant are married to each other. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Model that
|
||
|
||
6. Using Protege, place these in the BFO hierarchy where you think they fit best: | ||
``` | ||
Some of these questions are of course ambigous. In a real-life situation, we would talk with | ||
the domain experts/ client who asked us to build the ontology and understand what of the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Exactly
(c) SARS-CoV-2 | ||
Role | ||
(c) SARS-COV-2 | ||
Object (apparently we use this term to refer to the virus, not the disease/ disorder) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, the disease is COVID-19
(d) An organization may have no members as part. | ||
If organizations are object aggregates, this is false. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The current specification allows that organizations may have no members at some point, but they must've had members when created.
Hello John,
this is a pull request for Project 3.
I have closed the pull request for Project 2 since you already commented on it and I couldn't open a new one without closing the old one apparently.
Let me know if everything works!