-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"take-2": new Windows backend, ctypes-based, separate class which shards via Attributes #555
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm confused by this comment. It's saying that by re-saving the existing password using a compound target, it fixes part of 545, yet re-saving the existing password was already part of the prior change. Moreover, "get_credentials also needs to be fixed" feels like a misplaced TODO. Additionally, the comment doesn't say anything about what the code is meant to do, only has a reference to a reported issue.
By reading the issue, I now think the comment is only about the "if existing_username" check. The problem with putting the comment here is it becomes interleaved with the other comment, making it difficult to tell what comment goes with which parts of code. Since this change adds a whole new branch of code, it may be time to consider a refactor.
At the very least, I'd move the "resave" comment back to where it was (at the beginning of the
if existing_pw
branch and then move the rest of the comment into theif existing_username
branch and rephrase to indicate its essential purpose, something like, "Only set the compound target when usernames match. Ref #545."There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed.