Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: move /server-info endpoints to /server #10677

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2024

Conversation

zackpollard
Copy link
Contributor

This moves the /server-info endpoints to /server. After a recent discussion between @jrasm91 and I we decided having -info doesn't really make sense and restricts us to only having GET endpoints here really for "information" endpoints. We have upcoming PUT/POST/DELETE endpoints we want to put in the server context, so refactoring this to prepare for that.

These changes preserve /server-info and /server for the time being, with only /server-info being included in the generated APIs. This will allow forward and backwards compatibility and we will remove /server-info and default to /server in a few versions time.

@zackpollard zackpollard force-pushed the chore/server-info-to-server branch 2 times, most recently from 4af4b87 to 087a4a2 Compare June 28, 2024 10:01
@zackpollard zackpollard force-pushed the chore/server-info-to-server branch from 087a4a2 to b1f041d Compare June 28, 2024 10:58
@zackpollard zackpollard force-pushed the chore/server-info-to-server branch 3 times, most recently from e1b16dc to c5b2a72 Compare June 28, 2024 13:56
@zackpollard zackpollard force-pushed the chore/server-info-to-server branch from c5b2a72 to e51a7d6 Compare June 28, 2024 13:58
@zackpollard zackpollard merged commit a2364a1 into main Jun 28, 2024
23 checks passed
@zackpollard zackpollard deleted the chore/server-info-to-server branch June 28, 2024 16:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants