Add cmd line arg to suppress header output

[tophmatthews]

Combined #29663 into this. Changed the header output stream to _console, and added command line arg to suppress header output. Testing requires a header() somewhere, which was advised against, so this doesn't have an associated test. Was tested locally using a header() in MooseTestApp.

Closes #29662

[tophmatthews]

Ugh, this comment got stuck in "review", sorry it didn't go out...anyways, heres the command line and old comment...

@loganharbour This PR builds on #29663 , so it's a bit convoluted with that update, but here is the cmd line I'm trying to add. I would like to be able to optionally suppress the header being printed. I tried to use CommonOutputAction, similar to #29665, but it's not built at this point (I think?).

[moosebuild]

Job Coverage, step Generate coverage on 3ba6e2e wanted to post the following:

Framework coverage

	e193a3	#29669 3ba6e2
	Total	Total	+/-	New
Rate	85.25%	85.26%	+0.00%	80.00%
Hits	108024	108027	+3	4
Misses	18686	18683	-3	1

Diff coverage report

Full coverage report

Modules coverage

Coverage did not change

Full coverage reports

Reports

• framework
• chemical_reactions
• combined
• contact
• electromagnetics
• external_petsc_solver
• fluid_properties
• fsi
• functional_expansion_tools
• geochemistry
• heat_transfer
• level_set
• misc
• navier_stokes
• optimization
• peridynamics
• phase_field
• porous_flow
• ray_tracing
• rdg
• reactor
• richards
• scalar_transport
• solid_mechanics
• solid_properties
• stochastic_tools
• thermal_hydraulics
• xfem

Warnings

• framework new line coverage rate 80.00% is less than the suggested 90.0%

This comment will be updated on new commits.

[tophmatthews]

Can someone pass judgement on including a test on this @GiudGiud @loganharbour @pbehne ? The simplest is a header() in MooseTestApp like 9e54f63

[loganharbour]

Can someone pass judgement on including a test on this @GiudGiud @loganharbour @pbehne ? The simplest is a header() in MooseTestApp like 9e54f63

I think we should just make another dummy app for it so that we don't get a header in every moose_test-opt run

[tophmatthews]

Could also put a header in MiscApp

[loganharbour]

Could also put a header in MiscApp

I don't like testing framework content outside of the framework. misc testing doesn't contribute to framework coverage for example.

If we don't want another app, we can just do something silly like --test-set-header="foo" in MooseTestApp and then have header() return that result. So the header only shows up when we set it to. Goofy cause we'll basically have

--suppress-header --test-set-header="foo"

but we've done worse.

[moosebuild]

Job Documentation, step Docs: sync website on 3ba6e2e wanted to post the following:

View the site here

This comment will be updated on new commits.