-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 215
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix copyImageToCanvas bug and add ReadImageToCanvasOptions #7539
Open
andremig-bentley
wants to merge
22
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
andremig/decoration
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 12 commits
Commits
Show all changes
22 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d10e008
init commit
andremig-bentley cb438a7
create canvasDecorations view flag, fix copy image bug
andremig-bentley b9d78c3
cleanup
andremig-bentley 18694a8
Merge branch 'master' into andremig/decoration
andremig-bentley 8e49ea3
rush change
andremig-bentley 1066412
update rush change
andremig-bentley e39235e
Merge branch 'master' into andremig/decoration
andremig-bentley e38bfa3
rm view flag changes
andremig-bentley 570759b
cleanup, extract-api
andremig-bentley 5b86b52
Add ReadImageToCanvasOptions, SaveImageWithCanvasDecorations Tool
andremig-bentley a19ad85
Merge branch 'master' into andremig/decoration
andremig-bentley b3b93be
extract api
andremig-bentley 0807157
rm SaveImageWithDecorations tool, update dta readme
andremig-bentley 40fa886
Merge branch 'master' into andremig/decoration
andremig-bentley 1231e41
cleanup
andremig-bentley d683c4d
Merge branch 'andremig/decoration' of https://github.com/iTwin/itwinj…
andremig-bentley ae3eac8
NextVersion
andremig-bentley b600995
Merge branch 'master' into andremig/decoration
andremig-bentley 802c215
next version cleanup
andremig-bentley 42b90c9
Merge branch 'andremig/decoration' of https://github.com/iTwin/itwinj…
andremig-bentley e593f01
Merge branch 'master' into andremig/decoration
andremig-bentley 6b71824
test progress, includeCanvasDecorations -> omitCanvasDecorations, con…
andremig-bentley File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions
10
common/changes/@itwin/core-frontend/andremig-decoration_2025-01-10-16-41.json
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"changes": [ | ||
{ | ||
"packageName": "@itwin/core-frontend", | ||
"comment": "Add ReadImageToCanvasOptions", | ||
"type": "none" | ||
} | ||
], | ||
"packageName": "@itwin/core-frontend" | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No. Make the currently inconsistent behavior consistent.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you mean when
includeCanvasDecorations
is undefined, remove decorations for both single and multi viewport applications in the saved image?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I say
{ includeCanvasDecorations: false }
, the canvas decorations should be omitted, regardless of how many viewports I have open. Your@note
says they will be included even if I tell you to omit them, if more than one viewport is open.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is your note wrong? The comment above it is wrong (it claims any value other than
undefined
will cause the decorations to be included, but the property is a boolean).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The comment above it is wrong, should say if true they will be included. The note was correct with the current behavior - basically, if
includeCanvasDecorations !== true
then current behavior will persist, this meaning if one viewport, no decorations, if multiple viewports, decorations included. You're right that this is inconsistent, working on changing it to:if
includeCanvasDecorations === true
, then canvas decorations will be included, regardless of number of viewports. Otherwise, no canvas decorations will be included, regardless of number of viewports.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My recommendation is to make
includeCanvasDecorations
a non-optional property. The newoptions
argument toreadImageToCanvas
is necessarily optional. So if you don't supply any options, you get the current dumb behavior for backwards compatibility. If you supply the options, you must choose whether or not to include canvas decorations. Then you only need to document the dumb "how many viewports" logic in one place (onreadImageToCanvas
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably better:
Then you can make
includeCanvasDecorations
optional and give it a sane default behavior (include the decorations by default, in which case you should probably invert its name toomitCanvasDecorations
since undefined is falsy), and we'll be able to remove the dumb behavior eventually.