Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor BlockHashOperation block height check into Operation #8091

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shemnon
Copy link
Contributor

@shemnon shemnon commented Jan 9, 2025

PR description

Refactor the 4 different places block height is checked across Besu into the BlockHashOperation. Add support to make the lookback range configurable in the BlockHashLookup interface, but default it to 256.

Fixed Issue(s)

Thanks for sending a pull request! Have you done the following?

  • Checked out our contribution guidelines?
  • Considered documentation and added the doc-change-required label to this PR if updates are required.
  • Considered the changelog and included an update if required.
  • For database changes (e.g. KeyValueSegmentIdentifier) considered compatibility and performed forwards and backwards compatibility tests

Locally, you can run these tests to catch failures early:

  • unit tests: ./gradlew build
  • acceptance tests: ./gradlew acceptanceTest
  • integration tests: ./gradlew integrationTest
  • reference tests: ./gradlew ethereum:referenceTests:referenceTests

Refactor the 4 different places block height is checked across Besu into
the BlockHashOperation. Add support to make the lookback range
configurable in the BlockHashLookup interface, but default it to 256.

Signed-off-by: Danno Ferrin <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@Matilda-Clerke Matilda-Clerke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Signed-off-by: Danno Ferrin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Danno Ferrin <[email protected]>
@shemnon shemnon marked this pull request as draft January 9, 2025 06:42
@shemnon shemnon marked this pull request as ready for review January 9, 2025 18:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants