We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
几种slam算法的轨迹都与轨迹真值有个偏差,使用evo里面的轨迹处理工具,尝试矫正了一下,算出来的rmse偏差还是很大,想请问您是如何对齐轨迹与轨迹真值的呢?
这个图是fastlivo在eee03 使用evo_ape tum output_eee03.txt eee03_fastlivo2.txt -va --plot --plot_mode xyz --align_origin 对齐的结果,偏差还是很大。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
你没考虑leica和imu之间的外参,我记得那个外参有几十cm,按照官方的评估方法来 https://ntu-aris.github.io/ntu_viral_dataset/evaluation_tutorial.html#evaluate_onem
Sorry, something went wrong.
好的谢谢纯然哥!我再试试!
No branches or pull requests
几种slam算法的轨迹都与轨迹真值有个偏差,使用evo里面的轨迹处理工具,尝试矫正了一下,算出来的rmse偏差还是很大,想请问您是如何对齐轨迹与轨迹真值的呢?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: