-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY] #588
Open
renovate
wants to merge
1
commit into
master
Choose a base branch
from
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
from
December 23, 2022 18:22
352d77e
to
ba98a46
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
2 times, most recently
from
January 6, 2023 23:43
6f81154
to
90400be
Compare
renovate
bot
changed the title
Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY]
Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY] - autoclosed
Jan 7, 2023
renovate
bot
changed the title
Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY] - autoclosed
Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY]
Jan 7, 2023
renovate
bot
changed the title
Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY]
Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY] - autoclosed
Feb 3, 2023
renovate
bot
changed the title
Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY] - autoclosed
Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY]
Feb 3, 2023
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
4 times, most recently
from
June 2, 2023 19:37
f77d97d
to
05878e1
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
10 times, most recently
from
June 28, 2023 19:51
5bf4c91
to
d771a4a
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
from
June 29, 2023 19:26
d771a4a
to
c6ef085
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
from
August 28, 2023 23:27
5a219e3
to
b115e30
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
2 times, most recently
from
September 15, 2023 16:17
a4e4d21
to
f6570ed
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
2 times, most recently
from
September 24, 2023 08:54
bd8e060
to
fcd83d7
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
from
October 13, 2023 16:07
fcd83d7
to
51137cb
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
3 times, most recently
from
October 23, 2023 22:35
441f58a
to
077b087
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
from
October 27, 2023 21:58
077b087
to
8b66e53
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
from
November 28, 2023 22:02
8b66e53
to
6ddcbdc
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
4 times, most recently
from
December 21, 2023 21:47
88a8246
to
35b79a9
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
2 times, most recently
from
January 4, 2024 23:25
a0fa281
to
f45a7ca
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
2 times, most recently
from
January 21, 2024 15:00
4a333ee
to
3c37ff8
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
from
January 31, 2024 11:43
3c37ff8
to
ae5cd7f
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
2 times, most recently
from
February 23, 2024 21:39
41ffbef
to
392ceb2
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
2 times, most recently
from
March 1, 2024 21:56
9a8cf0b
to
c1c1756
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
from
March 17, 2024 14:47
c1c1756
to
f45ab1a
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
from
April 19, 2024 20:41
f45ab1a
to
5ae0147
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
from
April 28, 2024 20:54
5ae0147
to
fcb7d32
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
branch
from
May 2, 2024 23:56
fcb7d32
to
8b05964
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
0 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
8.5.1
->9.0.0
Warning
Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the warning logs for more information.
GitHub Vulnerability Alerts
CVE-2022-23539
Overview
Versions
<=8.5.1
ofjsonwebtoken
library could be misconfigured so that legacy, insecure key types are used for signature verification. For example, DSA keys could be used with the RS256 algorithm.Am I affected?
You are affected if you are using an algorithm and a key type other than the combinations mentioned below
And for Elliptic Curve algorithms:
alg
How do I fix it?
Update to version 9.0.0. This version validates for asymmetric key type and algorithm combinations. Please refer to the above mentioned algorithm / key type combinations for the valid secure configuration. After updating to version 9.0.0, If you still intend to continue with signing or verifying tokens using invalid key type/algorithm value combinations, you’ll need to set the
allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes
option totrue
in thesign()
and/orverify()
functions.Will the fix impact my users?
There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you already use a valid secure combination of key type and algorithm. Otherwise, use the
allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes
option totrue
in thesign()
andverify()
functions to continue usage of invalid key type/algorithm combination in 9.0.0 for legacy compatibility.CVE-2022-23541
Overview
Versions
<=8.5.1
ofjsonwebtoken
library can be misconfigured so that passing a poorly implemented key retrieval function (referring to thesecretOrPublicKey
argument from the readme link) will result in incorrect verification of tokens. There is a possibility of using a different algorithm and key combination in verification than the one that was used to sign the tokens. Specifically, tokens signed with an asymmetric public key could be verified with a symmetric HS256 algorithm. This can lead to successful validation of forged tokens.Am I affected?
You will be affected if your application is supporting usage of both symmetric key and asymmetric key in jwt.verify() implementation with the same key retrieval function.
How do I fix it?
Update to version 9.0.0.
Will the fix impact my users?
There is no impact for end users
CVE-2022-23540
Overview
In versions <=8.5.1 of jsonwebtoken library, lack of algorithm definition and a falsy secret or key in the
jwt.verify()
function can lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to thenone
algorithm for signature verification.Am I affected?
You will be affected if all the following are true in the
jwt.verify()
function:How do I fix it?
Update to version 9.0.0 which removes the default support for the none algorithm in the
jwt.verify()
method.Will the fix impact my users?
There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you don’t need to allow for the
none
algorithm. If you need 'none' algorithm, you have to explicitly specify that injwt.verify()
options.Release Notes
auth0/node-jsonwebtoken (jsonwebtoken)
v9.0.0
Compare Source
Breaking changes: See Migration from v8 to v9
Breaking changes
8345030
]auth0/node-jsonwebtoken@8345030)ecdf6cc
]auth0/node-jsonwebtoken@ecdf6cc)Security fixes
Arbitrary File Write via verify function
- CVE-2022-23529Insecure default algorithm in jwt.verify() could lead to signature validation bypass
- CVE-2022-23540Insecure implementation of key retrieval function could lead to Forgeable Public/Private Tokens from RSA to HMAC
- CVE-2022-23541Unrestricted key type could lead to legacy keys usage
- CVE-2022-23539Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.