Draft: parallelize match computation in pycbc_brute_bank by shrinking multiple templates #4815
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Opening it here for discussion. I'd like to further parallelize pycbc_brute_bank wherever possible. The idea is to shrink multiple waveforms at once, as many as the parallel processes.
However, it doesn't really work as fast as I expected. It's actually much slower than a serial computation altogether. I suspect it's because of resource contention inside of the multiple processes.
I'd also like to explore the consequences to return inside one of the multiprocessing pools.