Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GSYE-835: Adapt TankEnergyParameters.get_min_energy_consumption so th… #1826

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

hannesdiedrich
Copy link
Member

…e storage temperature can drop to its mininum

Reason for the proposed changes

Please describe what we want to achieve and why.

Proposed changes

INTEGRATION_TESTS_BRANCH=master
GSY_FRAMEWORK_BRANCH=master

…e storage temperature can drop to its mininum
@hannesdiedrich hannesdiedrich requested a review from a team January 14, 2025 10:09
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.62%. Comparing base (197ad2e) to head (c8445be).
Report is 6 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1826      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.68%   69.62%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         150      150              
  Lines       14258    14264       +6     
  Branches     2672     2672              
==========================================
- Hits         9935     9932       -3     
- Misses       3798     3808      +10     
+ Partials      525      524       -1     

Copy link
Member

@spyrostz spyrostz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, however this does not handle the unmatched heatpump demand if I recall this feature correctly. Frankly I was never too much of a fan of this feature and I do not mind skipping its implementation, just asking to have the full picture here.

@hannesdiedrich
Copy link
Member Author

LGTM, however this does not handle the unmatched heatpump demand if I recall this feature correctly. Frankly I was never too much of a fan of this feature and I do not mind skipping its implementation, just asking to have the full picture here.

AFAIS, the implementation of the unmatched demand is not influenced by this change.

def get_unmatched_demand_kWh(self, time_slot: DateTime) -> float:

It depends on the get_temp_increase_K which in turn depends on the traded energy.

In this PR we only change the value of the bid energy, so before trading.

@hannesdiedrich hannesdiedrich merged commit e852e58 into master Feb 4, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@hannesdiedrich hannesdiedrich deleted the feature/GSYE-835 branch February 4, 2025 09:24
@spyrostz
Copy link
Member

spyrostz commented Feb 4, 2025

LGTM, however this does not handle the unmatched heatpump demand if I recall this feature correctly. Frankly I was never too much of a fan of this feature and I do not mind skipping its implementation, just asking to have the full picture here.

AFAIS, the implementation of the unmatched demand is not influenced by this change.

def get_unmatched_demand_kWh(self, time_slot: DateTime) -> float:

It depends on the get_temp_increase_K which in turn depends on the traded energy.
In this PR we only change the value of the bid energy, so before trading.

Got it and thanks for the clarification!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants