Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add SPDX identifiers, document S-O-B and SPDX #197

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

evelikov
Copy link
Contributor

As requested previously.

Note: the last file .github/workflows/main.yml will come shortly, forgot it in my kmod PR.

Would it make sense to have DCO in-tree, for transparency and archival (aka if we get v1.2, v2) purposes?
Reuse-tool would complain in that case, here is what the maintainer suggested [1] we can do. Any preferences?

[1] fsfe/reuse-tool#1075

As highlighted by reuse-tool, these were missing the copyright and
licensing information.

Since they are based on the ones we have in kmod - we inherit the same
details.

Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Document the expectations around Signed-off-by, DCO and SPDX.

Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
@gregkh
Copy link
Owner

gregkh commented Sep 24, 2024

looks great, thanks!

I don't want to add a copy of the DCO, let's just keep the link, that makes REUSE use simpler.

@gregkh gregkh merged commit 616b1f2 into gregkh:master Sep 24, 2024
8 checks passed
@evelikov evelikov deleted the spdx branch September 25, 2024 14:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants