-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
C++: Resolve typedef
s when matching MaD parameters
#18386
Merged
MathiasVP
merged 8 commits into
github:main
from
MathiasVP:more-robust-param-name-matching
Jan 6, 2025
+313
−14
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5ccc12c
C++: Add a testcase that demonstrates the problem with MaD and typedefs.
MathiasVP 3d3feb6
C++: Also resolve typedefs when parsing MaD model parameter names.
MathiasVP 682dd42
C++: Accept test changes.
MathiasVP 9672af3
C++: Cache 'interpretElement'. This reduces DIL size of 'cpp/unbounde…
MathiasVP bfd18bc
Update cpp/ql/lib/semmle/code/cpp/dataflow/ExternalFlow.qll
MathiasVP f3085fc
Update cpp/ql/lib/semmle/code/cpp/dataflow/ExternalFlow.qll
MathiasVP 75a3b6b
Update cpp/ql/lib/semmle/code/cpp/dataflow/ExternalFlow.qll
MathiasVP 99ad184
Update cpp/ql/lib/semmle/code/cpp/dataflow/ExternalFlow.qll
MathiasVP File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm trying to convince myself
ArrayType
doesn't need to be a special case here. BecausegetName
already handles it adequately???There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could add
ArrayType
as well. I didn't bother with it because very very few parameters are actually declared as array types (since they decay to pointers anyway). But we can add them just to be safe in case we ever want to model some strange function that has an array as a parameter.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Might be better to address it now and avoid surprises in future then - but I don't feel strongly about this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed in a follow-up PR: #18416