Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libsubprocess: cosmetic cleanup #6642

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025
Merged

Conversation

garlick
Copy link
Member

@garlick garlick commented Feb 14, 2025

This tidies up some minor stuff in bulk-exec.[ch] and its test program. Purely cosmetic.

Problem: the bulk-exec code for sdexec includes a comment referencing
"imp kill", but that IMP subcommand was dropped.

Drop the example from the comment.
Problem: bulk_exec_imp_kill() was removed but its prototype remains.

Drop the function prototype and a comment reference to it.
Problem: some line breaks in a bulk-exec test do not conform to RFC 7.

Break long parameter lists to one per line at the same indent level.
Copy link
Contributor

@grondo grondo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, thanks!

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 820dd72 into flux-framework:master Feb 14, 2025
35 checks passed
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.87%. Comparing base (934fcd8) to head (ac5dd98).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6642      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.88%   83.87%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         533      533              
  Lines       88372    88372              
==========================================
- Hits        74127    74119       -8     
- Misses      14245    14253       +8     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/common/libsubprocess/bulk-exec.c 83.42% <ø> (ø)

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

@garlick garlick deleted the bulk_cleanup branch February 14, 2025 17:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants