Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Single pulse extraction improvement #164

Merged
merged 102 commits into from
Nov 25, 2016
Merged

Conversation

relleums
Copy link
Member

The API is much more flexible now (no more static global variables). I would like to make this a production release (in the master) as soon as possible to process all our data at ISDC before it is only available on tapes.

jebuss and others added 30 commits September 20, 2016 14:10
…alized each subtraction time, since we do not forsee it to change in amplitude.
…um once from the timeseries in the beginning of the extraction.
Copy link
Member

@kbruegge kbruegge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks okay to me. I made some comments on some minor things. Can be merged now howerver. In my opinion.

* @param array2d 2dim double array
* @return flattend double array
*/
public static double[] flatten2dArray(double[][] array2d) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No sure we need an extra function for this. The one line you wrote here is pretty nice and already right? Maybe it can be used directly.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We decided to keep this for now.


public Config config;

public double[] pulseToLookFor;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure, but it looks to me like some of these variables could be made final. Just to add a bit more rigor to the class. So nobody gets the idea to change these references.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We cannot set them final

import stream.Processor;
import stream.annotations.Parameter;

import javax.rmi.CORBA.Util;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know what this is. Probably an accidental import right? sometimes intellij is too fast for me ^^

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@kbruegge kbruegge added this to the 0.17.0 milestone Nov 21, 2016
@jebuss
Copy link
Member

jebuss commented Nov 21, 2016

I also think that this can be merged. If it is not superduper urgent I would suggest to have look on friday and then merge it. Maybe we could even fix #162 by then.

Copy link
Member

@jebuss jebuss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jebuss jebuss merged commit 98e20b2 into master Nov 25, 2016
@maxnoe maxnoe deleted the singlePulseExtractionImprovement branch June 5, 2017 11:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants