Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: gauzy desktop missing dependencies #8648

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2024

Conversation

syns2191
Copy link
Collaborator

@syns2191 syns2191 commented Dec 29, 2024

PR

Please note: we will close your PR without comment if you do not check the boxes above and provide ALL requested information.


Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Dependencies

    • Added new local package dependencies:
      • @gauzy/auth
      • @gauzy/plugin
      • @gauzy/core
      • @gauzy/common
  • Configuration

    • Updated workspace paths to include new plugin and configuration packages

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the package.json for the Gauzy desktop application by expanding its workspace configuration and dependencies. Three new workspace paths have been added for integration AI, job proposals, and configuration packages. Additionally, new local dependencies have been introduced, including @gauzy/auth, @gauzy/plugin, @gauzy/core, and @gauzy/common, which are linked to their respective local package paths. These changes aim to enhance the application's modular structure and extend its functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/desktop/src/package.json - Added workspace paths: ../../../dist/packages/plugins/integration-ai, ../../../dist/packages/plugins/job-proposal, ../../../dist/packages/config
- Added dependencies: @gauzy/auth, @gauzy/plugin, @gauzy/core, @gauzy/common

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

FIX

Suggested reviewers

  • evereq
  • adkif

Poem

🐰 In the realm of code, a desktop grows,
New paths and plugins, how it flows!
Dependencies dance, workspaces align,
A modular marvel, simply divine!
Gauzy's potential, now set to shine! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1a841e6 and 5ba11bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/desktop/src/package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/desktop/src/package.json (3)

Line range hint 1-200: LGTM! Changes align with fixing missing dependencies

The modifications to both workspaces and dependencies are well-structured and appropriate for a monorepo setup. Please ensure to:

  1. Review the results of the circular dependency checks
  2. Verify all peer dependencies are satisfied
  3. Add resolutions if any version conflicts are found

24-35: Verify workspace dependencies order and circular dependencies

The workspace additions look correct and align with fixing the missing dependencies. However, let's verify there are no circular dependencies between these packages.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the workspace dependencies since the dist directory might not be the right location to check.


Workspace dependencies are correctly ordered and no problematic circular dependencies found

Based on the package dependency analysis:

  1. The base packages follow a correct dependency order:

    • @gauzy/contracts (no dependencies)
    • @gauzy/common (depends on contracts)
    • @gauzy/config (depends on common, contracts)
    • @gauzy/auth (depends on common, config, contracts)
    • @gauzy/core (depends on auth, common, config, contracts, plugin)
  2. The plugin system and desktop packages also follow a proper hierarchy:

    • Plugin packages correctly depend on core packages
    • Desktop packages have proper layering (desktop-core → desktop-window → desktop-lib)

The workspace paths in package.json are correctly ordered from most dependent to least dependent packages, which helps avoid potential initialization issues.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential circular dependencies and validate package existence

# First, verify all workspace paths exist
echo "Verifying workspace paths exist..."
for path in \
    "dist/packages/plugins/integration-ai" \
    "dist/packages/plugins/job-proposal" \
    "dist/packages/config" \
    "dist/packages/auth" \
    "dist/packages/plugin" \
    "dist/packages/core" \
    "dist/packages/common"; do
    if [ ! -d "../../../$path" ]; then
        echo "Warning: Path not found: $path"
    fi
done

# Check for circular dependencies by analyzing package.json files
echo "Checking for circular dependencies..."
for path in dist/packages/{plugins/*,config,auth,plugin,core,common}; do
    if [ -f "../../../$path/package.json" ]; then
        echo "Analyzing dependencies in $path..."
        cat "../../../$path/package.json" | jq -r '.dependencies // {} | keys[]' | grep -E '@gauzy/'
    fi
done

Length of output: 3447


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check source packages instead of dist
echo "Checking source packages..."
fd -t f "package.json" packages/ -x cat {} | jq -r '. as $root | 
  ["Package: " + ($root.name // "unnamed"),
   "Dependencies:",
   (.dependencies // {} | to_entries[] | select(.key | startswith("@gauzy")) | "  " + .key)] | .[]'

Length of output: 4327


24-35: Verify peer dependencies for newly added packages

The local package dependencies look correct, but let's verify if all peer dependencies are satisfied for the newly added packages.

Consider adding a resolutions field in package.json if any conflicting peer dependencies are found.

Also applies to: 115-200

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the dependencies since the dist directory is not available in the sandbox environment. I'll check the source packages instead.


Based on the analysis of the package.json files, I can now provide a final response:

No peer dependency conflicts found for the local packages

After examining the package.json files for all packages in the repository:

  • None of the core packages (@gauzy/auth, @gauzy/plugin, @gauzy/core, @gauzy/common) have any peer dependencies specified
  • The dependencies between packages are properly aligned with workspace paths
  • All version references use the same pattern (^0.1.0) for internal packages
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for peer dependency requirements and conflicts

# Function to extract peer dependencies
check_peer_deps() {
    local pkg_path=$1
    if [ -f "$pkg_path" ]; then
        echo "Checking peer dependencies in $pkg_path..."
        cat "$pkg_path" | jq -r '.peerDependencies // {}'
    fi
}

# Check peer dependencies for new packages
for pkg in auth plugin core common; do
    check_peer_deps "../../../dist/packages/$pkg/package.json"
done

# Check for potential version conflicts in dependencies
echo "Checking for version conflicts..."
for pkg in $(find ../../../dist/packages -name "package.json"); do
    if [ -f "$pkg" ]; then
        jq -r '.dependencies // {} | to_entries | .[] | select(.value | startswith("^") or startswith("~")) | "\(.key): \(.value)"' "$pkg"
    fi
done

Length of output: 1028


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json files in the source packages
echo "Checking source packages for peer dependencies..."
for pkg in auth plugin core common; do
    pkg_path=$(fd -t f "package.json" -E "node_modules" | grep "packages/${pkg}/package.json" || true)
    if [ -n "$pkg_path" ]; then
        echo "=== Checking $pkg_path ==="
        jq -r '.peerDependencies // {}' "$pkg_path"
        echo
    fi
done

# Check for version conflicts in dependencies
echo "Checking for version conflicts in dependencies..."
fd -t f "package.json" -E "node_modules" | grep "packages/" | while read -r pkg; do
    echo "=== Checking $pkg ==="
    jq -r '.dependencies // {}' "$pkg"
    echo
done

Length of output: 36382


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Dec 29, 2024

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 5ba11bd.

Command Status Duration Result
nx build desktop --base-href ./ ✅ Succeeded 1m 41s View ↗
nx build desktop-api --output-path=dist/apps/de... ✅ Succeeded 26s View ↗
nx run api:desktop-api ✅ Succeeded 1m 10s View ↗
nx build gauzy -c=production --prod --verbose ✅ Succeeded 3m 54s View ↗
nx run gauzy:desktop-ui --base-href ./ ✅ Succeeded 3m 22s View ↗
nx build api -c=production --prod ✅ Succeeded 1m 6s View ↗
nx build desktop-ui-lib --configuration=production ✅ Succeeded 28s View ↗
nx build desktop-ui-lib --configuration=develop... ✅ Succeeded 28s View ↗
Additional runs (52) ✅ Succeeded ... View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2024-12-29 23:15:52 UTC

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants