Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix research images #1072

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions pages/research/research-overview.mdx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ This document provides an overview of Optimism’s approach to research and expe

Below are the key principles guiding our approach to experimental design. Our goal behind each of these principles is to take a thoughtful, data-driven approach as we iteratively design a resilient governance system.

![Principles for Designing Experiments.png](https://prod-files-secure.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/4b8b38c3-9876-41aa-bbe3-0f23be2b6ab4/6c14bffb-0a70-4dd8-8000-f88f96a1d262/Principles_for_Designing_Experiments.png)
![Principles for Designing Experiments](/img/research/experiment-principles.png)

*A note on the principle that **randomization = causal learning**:* Across disciplines and settings, causal learning requires randomization, because random assignment to treatment group ensures that the observed and unobserved characteristics are balanced evenly between treatment and control groups. Importantly, this removes selection bias (or other types of omitted variable bias) that otherwise influences results. Because of this, when possible, we aim to randomly select treatment and control group participants in our experiments.

Expand All @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ If teasing out causation via a quasi-experiment is also not possible, then we si

As we’ve discussed above, experiments are well-suited for a specific type of question (i.e., about cause and effect), though it’s sometime impractical to experiment with human behavior. And finally, experiments also take resources and time to execute well. With this in mind, here’s how we think about when to experiment:

![Should this be an experiment_.png](https://prod-files-secure.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/4b8b38c3-9876-41aa-bbe3-0f23be2b6ab4/398b17a4-6543-402d-87e9-990df8dd0623/Should_this_be_an_experiment_.png)
![Should this be an experiment](/img/research/experiment.png)

1. **Is this mission-critical?**
1. ***If yes, the research question is about existential parameters, then we want to experiment (if the next two answers are also “yes”)***
Expand Down
Binary file added public/img/research/experiment-principles.png
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Binary file added public/img/research/experiment.png
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Loading