Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to 1.85 toolchain #3146

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 20, 2025
Merged

Conversation

MabezDev
Copy link
Member

Thank you for your contribution!

We appreciate the time and effort you've put into this pull request.
To help us review it efficiently, please ensure you've gone through the following checklist:

Submission Checklist 📝

  • I have updated existing examples or added new ones (if applicable).
  • I have used cargo xtask fmt-packages command to ensure that all changed code is formatted correctly.
  • My changes were added to the CHANGELOG.md in the proper section.
  • I have added necessary changes to user code to the Migration Guide.
  • My changes are in accordance to the esp-rs API guidelines

Extra:

Pull Request Details 📖

Description

Please provide a clear and concise description of your changes, including the motivation behind these changes. The context is crucial for the reviewers.

Testing

Describe how you tested your changes.

@MabezDev MabezDev added the skip-changelog No changelog modification needed label Feb 18, 2025
@MabezDev MabezDev force-pushed the esp-1.85.0.0-testing branch 2 times, most recently from bf7ceee to b6cf2db Compare February 18, 2025 15:47
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ pub(crate) mod utils {
const PSRAM_EID_SIZE_M: u32 = 0x07;
const PSRAM_EID_SIZE_S: u32 = 5;

let size_id = (((dev_id) >> PSRAM_ID_EID_S) & PSRAM_ID_EID_M) >> PSRAM_EID_SIZE_S
let size_id = ((((dev_id) >> PSRAM_ID_EID_S) & PSRAM_ID_EID_M) >> PSRAM_EID_SIZE_S)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

eww

@bugadani
Copy link
Contributor

Yikes, we're missing a lot of bits from the PACs...

@MabezDev MabezDev changed the title test esp 1.85 toolchain Update to 1.85 toolchain Feb 20, 2025
@MabezDev MabezDev marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2025 11:40
@MabezDev
Copy link
Member Author

Marking as ready for review, we'll want these clippy changes in, and we'll also want to be testing the 1.85 compiler a bit so we can convert to latest at some point.

Yikes, we're missing a lot of bits from the PACs...

Yeah a lot of the PSRAM (and a lot of the soc module in general) is missing from the PACs :(

@MabezDev MabezDev force-pushed the esp-1.85.0.0-testing branch from b6cf2db to c04dea2 Compare February 20, 2025 11:41
Copy link
Member

@SergioGasquez SergioGasquez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@MabezDev MabezDev added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 20, 2025
Merged via the queue into esp-rs:main with commit b38d5cc Feb 20, 2025
27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip-changelog No changelog modification needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants